These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8341348)

  • 1. Life support for patients with cervical-level quadriplegia.
    Johnson DH; Bennahum D
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(9):663; author reply 664. PubMed ID: 8341348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Life support for patients with cervical-level quadriplegia.
    Ross LF
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(9):663; author reply 664. PubMed ID: 8341349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life support for patients with cervical-level quadriplegia.
    Conwill DE; Sorey WH; Herrin VE
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(9):664. PubMed ID: 8341351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life support for patients with cervical-level quadriplegia.
    Lehman LB
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(9):663-4. PubMed ID: 8341350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life support for patients with cervical-level quadriplegia.
    Flaherty DI
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(9):664. PubMed ID: 8341352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When life support is questioned early in the care of patients with cervical-level quadriplegia.
    Patterson DR; Miller-Perrin C; McCormick TR; Hudson LD
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Feb; 328(7):506-9. PubMed ID: 8421482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meaningful life and respecting brute autonomy: commentary on Spike.
    Peniston R
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):90-1; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 10904897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intention, action, and the dead donor rule: commentary on Spike.
    DuBois JM
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):78-84; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 10904895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Life support for cervical-level quadriplegia questioned.
    Hosp Ethics; 1993; 9(6):11-2. PubMed ID: 10129495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Controlled NHBD protocol for a fully conscious person: when death is intended as an end in itself and it has its own end.
    Spike J
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 10904894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining patient competency in treatment refusal cases.
    Wolfe KR
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Mar; (145):7-31. PubMed ID: 10183464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decisions by conscious persons about controlled NHBD after death: eyes wide open.
    DeVita MA; May T
    J Clin Ethics; 2000; 11(1):85-9; discussion 92-3. PubMed ID: 10904896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal myths about terminating life support.
    Meisel A
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 151(8):1497-502. PubMed ID: 1908215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Our method of treatment of traumatic quadriplegia.
    Yamada K; Ikata T; Tezuka A
    Proc Veterans Adm Spinal Cord Inj Conf; 1971; 18():55-60. PubMed ID: 5161647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient requested removal of ventilatory support in high-level tetraplegia: guidelines for the health care provider.
    Lemke DM
    SCI Nurs; 2001; 18(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 12035464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. No place to go: refusal of life-sustaining treatment by competent persons with physical disabilities.
    Herr SS; Bostrom BA; Barton RS
    Issues Law Med; 1992; 8(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 1385587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-related factors and circumstances surrounding decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment, including intensive care unit admission refusal.
    Reignier J; Dumont R; Katsahian S; Martin-Lefevre L; Renard B; Fiancette M; Lebert C; Clementi E; Bontemps F
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Jul; 36(7):2076-83. PubMed ID: 18552685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The refusal of life-saving medical treatment vs. the state's interest in the preservation of life: a clarification of the interests at stake.
    Davis SM
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1980; 58(1):85-116. PubMed ID: 11662841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dignified death: the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment and demand continuing comfort care at a private institution.
    Ibanez RM
    Ariz Law Rev; 1990; 32(3):717-38. PubMed ID: 12186068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discussions about the use of life-sustaining treatments: a literature review of physicians' and patients' attitudes and practices. End of Life Study Group.
    Layson RT; Adelman HM; Wallach PM; Pfeifer MP; Johnston S; McNutt RA
    J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 7841468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.