These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8342410)

  • 21. Feature-guided attentional capture cannot be prevented by spatial filtering.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():1-8. PubMed ID: 29458180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial attention can be allocated rapidly and in parallel to new visual objects.
    Eimer M; Grubert A
    Curr Biol; 2014 Jan; 24(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 24412208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sustained division of the attentional spotlight.
    Müller MM; Malinowski P; Gruber T; Hillyard SA
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6946):309-12. PubMed ID: 12867981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Object-based attentional selection--grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: comment on vecera and Farah (1994).
    Kramer AF; Weber TA; Watson SE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1997 Mar; 126(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 9090141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Top-down search for color prevents voluntary directing of attention to informative singleton cues.
    Worschech F; Ansorge U
    Exp Psychol; 2012; 59(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 22246061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Neuronal dynamics of bottom-up and top-down processes in area V4 of macaque monkeys performing a visual search.
    Ogawa T; Komatsu H
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 173(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 16506012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unmasking the contribution of low-level features to the guidance of attention.
    Ossandón JP; Onat S; Cazzoli D; Nyffeler T; Müri R; König P
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3478-87. PubMed ID: 23044277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An object-based visual attention model for robotic applications.
    Yu Y; Mann GK; Gosine RG
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Oct; 40(5):1398-412. PubMed ID: 20129865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments.
    Deco G; Pollatos O; Zihl J
    Vision Res; 2002 Dec; 42(27):2925-45. PubMed ID: 12450503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Crowding changes appearance.
    Greenwood JA; Bex PJ; Dakin SC
    Curr Biol; 2010 Mar; 20(6):496-501. PubMed ID: 20206527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: a search for boundary conditions.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Mar; 49(3):270-88. PubMed ID: 2011464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Action modulates object-based selection.
    Linnell KJ; Humphreys GW; McIntyre DB; Laitinen S; Wing AM
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2268-86. PubMed ID: 15924941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.
    Treisman A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):194-214. PubMed ID: 6461717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distinct representations of attentional control during voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts across objects and locations.
    Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Strumpf H; Krebs RM; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA
    Cereb Cortex; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1351-61. PubMed ID: 22593242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perceptual load modulates object-based attention.
    Ho MC; Atchley P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1661-9. PubMed ID: 19968427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic, object-based remapping of visual features in trans-saccadic perception.
    Melcher D
    J Vis; 2008 Oct; 8(14):2.1-17. PubMed ID: 19146303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implicitly perceived objects attract gaze during later free viewing.
    Pertzov Y; Zohary E; Avidan G
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 19761297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bottom-Up and Top-Down Factors Differentially Influence Stimulus Representations Across Large-Scale Attentional Networks.
    Long NM; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2495-2504. PubMed ID: 29437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.
    Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):77-99. PubMed ID: 20507828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.