236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8344970)
1. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
Spartera C; Morettini G; Marino G; Marsili L; Di Cesare E; La Barbera G; Petrassi C; Ventura M
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis.
White JE; Russell WL; Greer MS; Whittle MT
Am Surg; 1994 May; 60(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 8161084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis by duplex scanning magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography: a comparative study].
Guo D; Wang Y; Fu W
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 80(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11798743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography--preliminary study.
Remonda L; Heid O; Schroth G
Radiology; 1998 Oct; 209(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 9769818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Carotid bifurcation stenosis: a comparative study between MR angiography and duplex scanning with respect to digital subtraction angiography.
Carriero A; Ucchino S; Magarelli N; Legnini M; Macrì MA; Napolitano AM; Bonomo L
J Neuroradiol; 1995 Jun; 22(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 7629567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography?
Patel MR; Kuntz KM; Klufas RA; Kim D; Kramer J; Polak JF; Skillman JJ; Whittemore AD; Edelman RR; Kent KC
Stroke; 1995 Oct; 26(10):1753-8. PubMed ID: 7570720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
Hammond CJ; McPherson SJ; Patel JV; Gough MJ
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Angiography with magnetic resonance of the ++carotid arteries. Evaluation of clinical results obtained with low magnetic field equipment].
Pavone P; Catalano C; Di Girolamo M; Albertini Petroni G; Marsili L; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1993 Nov; 86(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 8272541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dual-energy CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery stenosis and occlusion].
Chen Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY; Liu W; Sun H; Wang X; Zhao WM; Wang Y; Mu WB
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2009 Apr; 31(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 19507603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
Bozzao A; Floris R; Villani A; Varrucciu V; Baviera ME; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reliability of ultrasound measurements of carotid stenosis compared to MRA and DSA.
Honish C; Sadanand V; Fladeland D; Chow V; Pirouzmand F
Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 Nov; 32(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16408576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Carotid duplex scan versus angiography in evaluation of carotid artery disease.
Fontenelle LJ; Simper SC; Hanson TL
Am Surg; 1994 Nov; 60(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 7978683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
