These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8345077)

  • 1. Psychological considerations of anonymous oocyte donation.
    Bertrand-Servais M; Letur-Könirsch H; Raoul-Duval A; Frydman R
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):874-9. PubMed ID: 8345077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recipients of oocytes donated anonymously. Psychological aspects].
    Bertrand-Servais M; Letur-Könirsch H; Raoul-Duval A; Frydman R
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(7):743-9. PubMed ID: 1469228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
    Laruelle C; Place I; Demeestere I; Englert Y; Delbaere A
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T; Saso S; Bora S; Ismail AM; Al-Memar M; Hamed AH; Abdalla H; Thum MY
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
    Baetens P; Devroey P; Camus M; Van Steirteghem AC; Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.
    Weil E; Cornet D; Sibony C; Mandelbaum J; Salat-Baroux J
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1344-7. PubMed ID: 7962446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G; Janson PO; Tägnfors U; Bergh C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decision for disclosure: The experiences of Iranian infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive donation procedures.
    Hadizadeh-Talasaz F; Roudsari RL; Simbar M
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2015; 18(4):265-75. PubMed ID: 26428703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anonymous oocyte donation: a psychological study of recipients, donors and children.
    Raoul-Duval A; Letur-Konirsch H; Frydman R
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jan; 7(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 1551958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A program for matched, anonymous oocyte donation.
    Kennard EA; Collins RL; Blankstein J; Schover LR; Kanoti G; Reiss J; Quigley MM
    Fertil Steril; 1989 Apr; 51(4):655-60. PubMed ID: 2924932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes about donor information differ greatly between IVF couples using their own gametes and those receiving or donating oocytes or sperm.
    Svanberg AS; Sydsjö G; Bladh M; Lampic C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Jun; 33(6):703-10. PubMed ID: 27059774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation preliminary results.
    Junca AM; Cohen J; Mandelbaum J; Alnot MO; Debache C; Plachot M; Pez JP
    Hum Reprod; 1988 Jan; 3(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 3350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do attitudes toward disclosure in donor oocyte recipients predict the use of anonymous versus directed donation?
    Greenfeld DA; Greenfeld DG; Mazure CM; Keefe DL; Olive DL
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Dec; 70(6):1009-14. PubMed ID: 9848287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Egg-sharing in assisted conception: ethical and practical considerations.
    Ahuja KK; Simons EG; Fiamanya W; Dalton M; Armar NA; Kirkpatrick P; Sharp S; Arian-Schad M; Seaton A; Watters WJ
    Hum Reprod; 1996 May; 11(5):1126-31. PubMed ID: 8671404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychiatric issues in non-anonymous oocyte donation. Motivations and expectations of women donors and recipients.
    Bartlett JA
    Psychosomatics; 1991; 32(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 1961858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Ovum donation. A review of and a suggestion to unified guidelines for treatment at public fertility clinics in Denmark].
    Andersen AN; Larsen JF; Hornnes PJ; Starup J; Andersen CY; Westergaard LG; Rasmussen PE; Ingerslev HJ; Maigaard S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Aug; 155(33):2515-9. PubMed ID: 8212352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How is the Czech oocyte donor? The analysis of their profile].
    Rumpíková T; Oborná I; Bělašková S; Rumpík D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29020785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation.
    Simón C; Gutiérrez A; Vidal A; de los Santos MJ; Tarín JJ; Remohí J; Pellicer A
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Apr; 9(4):725-9. PubMed ID: 8046030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oocyte cryopreservation for donor egg banking.
    Cobo A; Remohí J; Chang CC; Nagy ZP
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 21767989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive outcomes of familial oocyte donation.
    Hasson J; Tulandi T; Son WY; Al Ma'mari N; Badeghiesh A; Tannus S; Takefman J; Shavit T
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1696-1702. PubMed ID: 27678040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.