These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8345080)

  • 1. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study.
    Kahn JA; Sunde A; Koskemies A; von Düring V; Sørdal T; Christensen F; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Jun; 8(6):890-4. PubMed ID: 8345080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non tubal infertility.
    Cantineau AE; Cohlen BJ; Al-Inany H; Heineman MJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD001502. PubMed ID: 15266448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion has no advantage over intra-uterine insemination when used in combination with ovarian stimulation for the treatment of unexplained infertility.
    Gregoriou O; Pyrgiotis E; Konidaris S; Papadias C; Zourlas PA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1995; 39(4):226-8. PubMed ID: 7635364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion using a blocking device in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
    Ricci G; Nucera G; Pozzobon C; Boscolo R; Giolo E; Guaschino S
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Dec; 76(6):1242-8. PubMed ID: 11730758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Higher pregnancy rates with a simple method for fallopian tube sperm perfusion, using the cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study.
    Mamas L
    Hum Reprod; 1996 Dec; 11(12):2618-22. PubMed ID: 9021362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-uterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.
    Cantineau AE; Cohlen BJ; Heineman MJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD001502. PubMed ID: 19370567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal infertility.
    Shekhawat GS
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2012 Jul; 68(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 24532873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrauterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility.
    Cantineau AE; Cohlen BJ; Heineman MJ; Marjoribanks J; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; (10):CD001502. PubMed ID: 24174382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion versus intrauterine insemination in unexplained infertility: a randomized, prospective, cross-over trial.
    Biacchiardi CP; Revelli A; Gennarelli G; Rustichelli S; Moffa F; Massobrio M
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Feb; 81(2):448-51. PubMed ID: 14967388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrauterine insemination versus Fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal subfertility: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review.
    Cantineau AE; Heineman MJ; Al-Inany H; Cohlen BJ
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2721-9. PubMed ID: 15550500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: first clinical experience.
    Kahn JA; von Düring V; Sunde A; Sørdal T; Molne K
    Hum Reprod; 1992 Jun; 7 Suppl 1():19-24. PubMed ID: 1447366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion and intrauterine tuboperitoneal insemination: a prospective randomized study.
    Mamas L
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):735-40. PubMed ID: 16500346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands' semen.
    Ng EH; Makkar G; Yeung WS; Ho PC
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 12953328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility.
    Nuojua-Huttunen S; Tuomivaara L; Juntunen K; Tomás C; Martikainen H
    Fertil Steril; 1997 May; 67(5):939-42. PubMed ID: 9130904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination.
    Fanchin R; Olivennes F; Righini C; Hazout A; Schwab B; Frydman R
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Sep; 64(3):505-10. PubMed ID: 7641902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of unexplained infertility. Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP).
    Kahn JA; Sunde A; von Düring V; Sørdal T; Molne K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1993 Apr; 72(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 8385855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial of fallopian tube sperm perfusion compared with standard intrauterine insemination for women with non-tubal infertility.
    Farquhar CM; Brown J; Arroll N; Gupta D; Boothroyd CV; Al Bassam M; Moir J; Johnson NP
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2134-9. PubMed ID: 23578949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Questioning the efficacy of Fallopian tube sperm perfusion.
    El Sadek MM; Amer MK; Abdel-Malak G
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Nov; 13(11):3053-6. PubMed ID: 9853855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.
    Peeraer K; Debrock S; De Loecker P; Tomassetti C; Laenen A; Welkenhuysen M; Meeuwis L; Pelckmans S; Mol BW; Spiessens C; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM
    Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1079-88. PubMed ID: 25788569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The value of fallopian tube sperm perfusion in the management of mild-moderate male factor infertility.
    El-Khayat W; El-Mazny A; Abou-Salem N; Moafy A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2012 May; 117(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 22356757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.