These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8345399)

  • 1. [Changes in human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions with contralateral acoustic stimulation].
    Kashiwamura M; Satoh N; Fukuda S; Kawanami M; Chida E; Inuyama Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Jun; 96(6):922-30. PubMed ID: 8345399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Mott JB; Norton SJ; Neely ST; Warr WB
    Hear Res; 1989 Apr; 38(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 2708165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitudes.
    Ozturan O; Oysu C
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):129-36. PubMed ID: 9925024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent Acoustic Activation of the Medial Olivocochlear System Modifies the After-Effects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on the Human Inner Ear.
    Kugler K; Wiegrebe L; Gürkov R; Krause E; Drexl M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 16(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 26264256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Harrison WA; Burns EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2649-58. PubMed ID: 8270741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 89():67-71. PubMed ID: 27619031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission recordings during contralateral pure-tone activation of medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Bulut E; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2017 Jun; 104(2):171-182. PubMed ID: 28648121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in
    Cheatham MA; Zhou Y; Goodyear RJ; Dallos P; Richardson GP
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 30627650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
    Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A New Hypothesis on the Frequency Discrimination of the Cochlea.
    Bulut E; Uzun C; Öztürk L; Turan P; Kanter M; Arbak S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Aug; 13(2):204-210. PubMed ID: 28414275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans.
    Veuillet E; Martin V; Suc B; Vesson JF; Morgon A; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 11349796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Engler S; Köppl C; Manley GA; de Kleine E; van Dijk P
    Hear Res; 2020 Jan; 385():107835. PubMed ID: 31710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.
    Dewey JB; Lee J; Dhar S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):897-914. PubMed ID: 25245498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Isoflurane increases amplitude and incidence of evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Drexl M; Henke J; Kössl M
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):135-42. PubMed ID: 15276684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects.
    Moulin A; Collet L; Veuillet E; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):216-33. PubMed ID: 8458753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions.
    McFadden D; Mishra R
    Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8113138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.