These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8345554)

  • 1. Fetal growth: a comparison of growth curves with mathematical modeling.
    Shields LE; Huff RW; Jackson GM; Olive DL; Patterson RM
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 May; 12(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 8345554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The use of Rossavik's mathematical model in determining individual intrauterine growth curves. Our experience].
    Biagiotti R; Brizzi L; Cariati E; Puliga AS; Nannini R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1994 Mar; 46(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 8015703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
    Karki DB; Sharmqa UK; Rauniyar RK
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of fetal growth curves with mathematical modeling.
    Deter RL
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Nov; 12(11):639-40. PubMed ID: 8264013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mathematical modeling of fetal foot growth: use of the Rossavik growth model.
    Hata T; Senoh D; Hata K; Kitao M
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Apr; 13(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 8688106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
    Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation.
    Schwärzler P; Bland JM; Holden D; Campbell S; Ville Y
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14970994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Normal fetal growth profile--a uniform model for calculating normal curves for current head and abdomen parameters and long limb bones].
    Merz E; Wellek S
    Ultraschall Med; 1996 Aug; 17(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 8999513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of third-trimester ultrasound for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates and evaluation of contingency screening policies.
    Souka AP; Papastefanou I; Pilalis A; Michalitsi V; Kassanos D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 21858886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction.
    Caradeux J; Eixarch E; Mazarico E; Basuki TR; Gratacós E; Figueras F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 28332335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mathematical modeling of fetal organ growth using the Rossavik growth model: III. Cardiac ventricle.
    Manabe A; Hata T; Senoh D; Hata K; Kitao M
    Am J Perinatol; 1994 Sep; 11(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 7993508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated ultrasonographic measurement of basic fetal growth parameters.
    Pashaj S; Merz E; Petrela E
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 23129519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.
    Deter RL; Lee W; Sangi-Haghpeykar H; Tarca AL; Yeo L; Romero R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 May; 28(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 24993892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Transvaginal ultrasound biometry in early pregnancy--a growth model].
    Bahlmann F; Merz E; Weber G; Wellek S; Engelhardt O
    Ultraschall Med; 1997 Oct; 18(5):196-204. PubMed ID: 9441386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal prediction of neonatal growth status in twins using individualized growth assessment.
    Deter RL; Xu B; Milner LL
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Feb; 24(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 8621807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sonographic growth curves of triplet conceptions.
    Mordel N; Laufer N; Zajicek G; Shalev Z; Lewin A; Schenker JG; Sadovsky E
    Am J Perinatol; 1993 May; 10(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 8517904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of fetal sonographic measurements in the first trimester by transvaginal sonography.
    Izquierdo LA; Kushnir O; Smith JF; Gilson GJ; Chatterjee MS; Qualls C; Curet LB
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1991; 32(4):206-9. PubMed ID: 1778510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal growth velocity: kinetic, clinical, and biological aspects.
    Bertino E; Di Battista E; Bossi A; Pagliano M; Fabris C; Aicardi G; Milani S
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 1996 Jan; 74(1):F10-5. PubMed ID: 8653429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Z-scores to select a fetal biometric reference curve.
    Sananes N; Guigue V; Kohler M; Bouffet N; Cancellier M; Hornecker F; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Schmerber E; Tanghe M; Nisand I; Favre R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 19731264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.