224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8347281)
1. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat.
Patel UH; Jones JT; Babbs CF; Bourland JD; Graber GP
Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 8347281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure relief capabilities of the Sof.Care bed and the Clinitron bed.
Maklebust J; Siggreen MY; Mondoux L
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():32, 36-41, 44. PubMed ID: 3250579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interface pressure, wound healing, and satisfaction in the evaluation of a non-powered fluid mattress.
Wells JA; Karr D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Feb; 44(2):38-42, 44-6, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 9526420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.
Black J; Berke C; Urzendowski G
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 22552108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interface pressure comparison of healthy premature infants with various neonatal bed surfaces.
Turnage-Carrier C; McLane KM; Gregurich MA
Adv Neonatal Care; 2008 Jun; 8(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 18535423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of elevating the head of bed on interface pressure in volunteers.
Peterson M; Schwab W; McCutcheon K; van Oostrom JH; Gravenstein N; Caruso L
Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3038-42. PubMed ID: 18824905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.
Thompson-Bishop JY; Mottola CM
Decubitus; 1992 Mar; 5(2):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 1558691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical comparison of two pressure-reducing surfaces in the management of pressure ulcers.
Warner DJ
Decubitus; 1992 May; 5(3):52-5, 58-60, 62-4. PubMed ID: 1596352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quantitative analysis of pressure and shear in the effectiveness of support surfaces.
Fontaine R; Risley S; Castellino R
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1998 Sep; 25(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 9923257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
Ochs RF; Horn SD; van Rijswijk L; Pietsch C; Smout RJ
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Feb; 51(2):38-68. PubMed ID: 15699554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.
Tissue Viability Society
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20097075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.
Counsell C; Seymour S; Guin P; Hudson A
J Enterostomal Ther; 1990; 17(4):150-3. PubMed ID: 2380423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pressure-reducing capability of Conforma II mattress overlay.
Reynolds A; Suarez C
Adv Wound Care; 1994 Jul; 7(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 7827746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Full-body interface pressure testing as a method for performance evaluation of clinical support surfaces.
Shelton F; Barnett R; Meyer E
Appl Ergon; 1998 Dec; 29(6):491-7. PubMed ID: 9796795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
