127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8348496)
1. The palpable breast nodule. A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternate diagnostic approaches.
Layfield LJ; Chrischilles EA; Cohen MB; Bottles K
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(5):1642-51. PubMed ID: 8348496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative cost-effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy versus image-guided biopsy, and open surgical biopsy in the evaluation of breast cancer in the era of Affordable Care Act: a changing landscape.
Masood S; Rosa M; Kraemer DF; Smotherman C; Mohammadi A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):605-12. PubMed ID: 25722099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the triple test score to traditional methods for evaluating palpable breast masses.
Morris AM; Flowers CR; Morris KT; Schmidt WA; Pommier RF; Vetto JT
Med Care; 2003 Aug; 41(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12886175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The palpable breast nodule: a cost-effectiveness analysis of alternate diagnostic approaches. The role of the needle aspiration biopsy.
Koss LG
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(5):1499-502. PubMed ID: 8348484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of radiologically directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Masood S; Frykberg ER; McLellan GL; Scalapino MC; Mitchum DG; Bullard JB
Cancer; 1990 Oct; 66(7):1480-7. PubMed ID: 2169989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the costs of fine-needle aspiration and open surgical biopsy as methods for obtaining a pathologic diagnosis.
Rimm DL; Stastny JF; Rimm EB; Ayer S; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Feb; 81(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 9100542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the cost-effectiveness of stereotaxic biopsy for nonpalpable breast abnormalities: a decision analysis model.
Hillner BE; Bear HD; Fajardo LL
Acad Radiol; 1996 Apr; 3(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 8796686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of the role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and management of patients with palpable solid breast lesions.
Gelabert HA; Hsiu JG; Mullen JT; Jaffe AH; D'Amato NA
Am Surg; 1990 Apr; 56(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 2163593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unsuccessful preoperative biopsies, fine needle aspiration cytology or core needle biopsy, lead to increased costs in the diagnostic workup in breast cancer.
Hukkinen K; Kivisaari L; Heikkilä PS; Von Smitten K; Leidenius M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(6):1037-45. PubMed ID: 18607862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings.
Lee CH; Egglin TK; Philpotts L; Mainiero MB; Tocino I
Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 9051045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Stereotaxic mammary core biopsy. II. Complementarity or competition with surgical biopsy].
Thiesse P; Guérin N; Treilleux I; Brémond A
Ann Chir; 1996; 50(6):463-9. PubMed ID: 8991203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities.
Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Non palpable lesions of the breast: the Mammotome-biopsy in the preoperative management of breast cancer].
Ceccarelli G; Casciola L; Battistini I; Stefanoni M; Spaziani A; Conti D; Di Zitti L; Valeri R; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Rambotti M; Pisanelli MC
G Chir; 2005 May; 26(5):187-93. PubMed ID: 16184700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the "triple test" for palpable breast lesions yields high diagnostic accuracy and cost savings.
Vetto J; Pommier R; Schmidt W; Wachtel M; DuBois P; Jones M; Thurmond A
Am J Surg; 1995 May; 169(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 7747833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost-effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration cytology and 14-gauge core needle biopsy compared with open surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma.
Logan-Young W; Dawson AE; Wilbur DC; Avila EE; Tomkiewicz ZM; Sheils LA; Laczin JA; Taylor AS
Cancer; 1998 May; 82(10):1867-73. PubMed ID: 9587118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration biopsy: are there similar sampling and diagnostic issues?
Masood S
Clin Lab Med; 2005 Dec; 25(4):679-88, vi. PubMed ID: 16308086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of persistent palpable dominant breast masses.
Hindle WH; Payne PA; Pan EY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1814-8; discussion 1818-9. PubMed ID: 8317526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effective use of breast biopsy techniques in a Veterans health care system.
Hatmaker AR; Donahue RM; Tarpley JL; Pearson AS
Am J Surg; 2006 Nov; 192(5):e37-41. PubMed ID: 17071179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and frozen-section evaluation in the surgical management of thyroid nodules.
Caraci P; Aversa S; Mussa A; Pancani G; Ondolo C; Conticello S
Br J Surg; 2002 Jun; 89(6):797-801. PubMed ID: 12027995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
