These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8348604)

  • 1. Double-lumen catheter assessment of aortic stenosis: comparison with separate catheter technique.
    Jayne JE; Catherwood E; Niles NW; Friedman BJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Jun; 29(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 8348604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility of a pressure wire and single arterial puncture for assessing aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis.
    Bae JH; Lerman A; Yang E; Rihal C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Aug; 18(8):359-62. PubMed ID: 16877782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodologic issues in clinical evaluation of stenosis severity in adults undergoing aortic or mitral balloon valvuloplasty. The NHLBI Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry.
    Otto CM; Davis KB; Holmes DR; O'Neill W; Ferguson J; Bashore TM; Bonan R
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 69(19):1607-16. PubMed ID: 1598878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic stenosis catheterization revisited: a long sheath single-puncture technique.
    Hays J; Lujan M; Chilton R
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2006 Jun; 18(6):262-7. PubMed ID: 16751678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of computer-based quantification of aortic valve stenosis.
    Schöbel WA; Voelker W; Obergfell S; Haase KK; Karsch KR
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 May; 44(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 9600516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echographic application of the Gorlin formula for assessment of aortic stenosis: correlation with cardiac catheterization in pediatric patients.
    Seitz WS; McIlroy MB; Kline H; Operschall J; Kashani IA
    Am Heart J; 1986 Jun; 111(6):1118-22. PubMed ID: 3716987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.
    Tardif JC; Rodrigues AG; Hardy JF; Leclerc Y; Petitclerc R; Mongrain R; Mercier LA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 May; 29(6):1296-302. PubMed ID: 9137227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis.
    Laskey WK; Kussmaul WG
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 8281636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures in aortic stenosis using a double lumen pigtail catheter.
    Stoebe T; Adicoff A; Weir EK; Chesler E
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1984; 10(5):515-7. PubMed ID: 6518516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis.
    Blitz LR; Herrmann HC
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 78(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 8831400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis.
    Burwash IG; Thomas DD; Sadahiro M; Pearlman AS; Verrier ED; Thomas R; Kraft CD; Otto CM
    Circulation; 1994 Feb; 89(2):827-35. PubMed ID: 8313572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding the catheter-Doppler pressure gradient discrepancy in aortic stenosis.
    Pai RG; Pai AD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 21714420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of catheter positioning on the variability of measured gradient in aortic stenosis.
    Assey ME; Zile MR; Usher BW; Karavan MP; Carabello BA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Dec; 30(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8287452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simplified method for calculating aortic valve resistance: correlation with valve area and standard formula.
    Kegel JG; Schalet BD; Corin WJ; Iskandrian AS
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Sep; 30(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 8402857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.
    Baumgartner H; Stefenelli T; Niederberger J; Schima H; Maurer G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 May; 33(6):1655-61. PubMed ID: 10334438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and utility of dobutamine and pressure wire use in the hemodynamic assessment of low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Fanari Z; Gunasekaran PC; Shaukat A; Hammami S; Dawn B; Wiley M; Tadros P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Jun; 19(4):438-443. PubMed ID: 29402710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculation of the aortic valve gradient from the left ventricular-femoral and aortic-femoral pairs of pressure waveforms.
    Degeratu FT; Kreulen TH
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 May; 44(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 9600514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients.
    Isaaz K; Gaillard O; Cerisier A; Da Costa A; Faure E; Lamaud M; Gerenton C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15222280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study.
    Meredith IT; Walters DL; Dumonteil N; Worthley SG; Tchétché D; Manoharan G; Blackman DJ; Rioufol G; Hildick-Smith D; Whitbourn RJ; Lefèvre T; Lange R; Müller R; Redwood S; Feldman TE; Allocco DJ; Dawkins KD
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 9(4):376-384. PubMed ID: 26892084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
    Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
    Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.