These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8348797)

  • 1. The referee process.
    Granath L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1993 Jun; 21(3):178-9. PubMed ID: 8348797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewing refereeing.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2011 Feb; 13(2):109. PubMed ID: 21283117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The peer review process: Giving and receiving advice.
    Jull G; Moore A
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Apr; 40():v. PubMed ID: 30773425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peering into the review process.
    Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does editorial peer review work?
    Lock S
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Jul; 121(1):60-1. PubMed ID: 8198351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comment: blind peer review of journal articles.
    Shaughnessy AF
    Drug Intell Clin Pharm; 1988 Dec; 22(12):1006. PubMed ID: 3243172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making the most of peer review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2000 Jul; 3(7):629. PubMed ID: 10862686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review and accountability.
    Hardy LK
    Can J Nurs Res; 1991; 23(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 1802369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Art of Peer Review.
    Fraser D
    Neonatal Netw; 2018 Jul; 37(4):195-196. PubMed ID: 30567915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition for peer review.
    Mullan Z
    Lancet Glob Health; 2016 Nov; 4(11):e784. PubMed ID: 27653276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
    Brandon D; McGrath JM
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Report by the editors.
    Kehrer JP; Dekant W
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Aug; 143(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 12849684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to evaluate and acknowledge a scientific journal peer reviewer: a proposed index to measure the performance of reviewers.
    Messias AMV; Lira RPC; Furtado JMF; Paula JS; Rocha EM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2017; 80(6):V. PubMed ID: 29267566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Farther, faster, and (hopefully) better!
    Link AM; LaRusso NF
    Gastroenterology; 1992 Sep; 103(3):1099-101. PubMed ID: 1499911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.