BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8349168)

  • 21. Syringe or mask? Loop electrosurgical excision procedure under local or general anesthesia: a randomized trial.
    Rezniczek GA; Hecken JM; Rehman S; Dogan A; Tempfer CB; Hilal Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 223(6):888.e1-888.e9. PubMed ID: 32585223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Partial trachelectomy in the elderly patient with abnormal cytology.
    Krebs HB; Wilstrup MA; Wheelock JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 3982732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laser conization versus cold knife conization.
    Larsson G; Alm P; Grundsell H
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Jan; 154(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 7053590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of the frozen section in sharp knife cone biopsy of the cervix.
    Woodford HD; Poston W; Elkins TE
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Oct; 31(10):951-3. PubMed ID: 3537286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision.
    Giacalone PL; Laffargue F; Aligier N; Roger P; Combecal J; Daures JP
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 10600289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization.
    Naumann RW; Bell MC; Alvarez RD; Edwards RP; Partridge EE; Helm CW; Shingleton HM; McGee JA; Higgins RV; Hall JB
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Nov; 55(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 7959288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    van Hanegem N; Barroilhet LM; Nucci MR; Bernstein M; Feldman S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22030403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia.
    Bozanović T; Ljubic A; Momcilov P; Milicevic S; Mostić T; Atanacković J
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 18386472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial.
    Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Dec; 55(3 Pt 1):368-70. PubMed ID: 7835776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The "unsatisfactory" colposcopic examination.
    Rochelson B; Krumholz BA
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Feb; 28(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 6834353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
    Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cold knife conization and loop excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Takac I; Gorisek B
    Tumori; 1999; 85(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10587025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization.
    Larsson G; Gullberg B; Grundsell H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Aug; 62(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 6408545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure with or without intraoperative colposcopy: a randomized trial.
    Hilal Z; Rezniczek GA; Alici F; Kumpernatz A; Dogan A; Alieva L; Tempfer CB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 219(4):377.e1-377.e7. PubMed ID: 30063903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Procedures of cervical conization: a national survey among Italian colposcopy units.
    Sopracordevole F; DI Giuseppe J; Mancioli F; DE Piero G; Buttignol M; Ciavattini A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2016 Apr; 68(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 27008241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Knife conization versus loop excision--clinical and histomorphologic results].
    Girardi F; Heydarfadai M; Koroschetz F; Pickel H; Winter R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1994; 34(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 7987084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of cold knife, CO2 laser, and electrosurgical loop conization in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Lewis PL; Lashgari M
    J Gynecol Surg; 1994; 10(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 10150434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiosurgery in the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Kainz C; Tempfer C; Sliutz G; Breitenecker G; Reinthaller A
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jun; 41(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 8799916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of cold conization and directed biopsy.
    Ahern JK
    J Reprod Med; 1978 Feb; 20(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 625040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Predictive value of endocervical curettage at cervical conization and provider practices in management of high-grade cervical dysplasia.
    Barlin JN; Bristow RE; Murillo AM; Zahurak M; Veras E; Salani R
    J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(3-4):129-33. PubMed ID: 20506673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.