These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8350926)

  • 21. [What is the benefit of screening for breast cancer? Contra].
    Schmidt JG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S178-98. PubMed ID: 9133272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
    Lisby MD
    Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Are there downsides to mammography screening?
    Baines CJ
    Breast J; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():S7-10. PubMed ID: 15725116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [No evidence that routine mammography screening is effective].
    Ståhle L; Sjönell G
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Feb; 97(7):742-3. PubMed ID: 10740384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [German Mammography Study: commission, cooperative structure, results and consequences].
    Robra BP; Swart E; Dierks ML
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1997 Sep; 91(6):541-2. PubMed ID: 9441030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening mammography. When should it stop?
    Byers T; Costanza ME; Kattlove H
    Cancer Pract; 1997; 5(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 9128497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The controversy over screening mammography.
    Gifford DS
    Med Health R I; 2002 Mar; 85(3):101-2. PubMed ID: 11917742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Screening mammography may not be effective at any age.
    Wilkerson BF; Schooff M
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 49(4):302, 371. PubMed ID: 10778833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Breast cancer].
    Fukuda M; Miyamoto K; Hashizume R; Okamoto J; Kawamoto H; Yabuki Y; Ogata H; Ohta T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2002 Nov; 29(11):1900-6. PubMed ID: 12465388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Conflicting views: the readers respond.
    Science; 1992 Jul; 257(5070):625. PubMed ID: 17740728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Readers respond to the Hadiza Bawa-Garba case.
    Twisselmann B
    BMJ; 2018 Mar; 360():k1031. PubMed ID: 29519783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Readers respond.
    Wig NN
    Mens Sana Monogr; 2008 Jan; 6(1):280. PubMed ID: 22013366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Readers respond.
    Wig NN
    Mens Sana Monogr; 2005 Nov; 3(2):54. PubMed ID: 22679357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Readers respond.
    Mens Sana Monogr; 2004 Jan; 2(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 22815597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Readers respond.
    Mens Sana Monogr; 2004 Jan; 2(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 22815602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Readers respond.
    Mens Sana Monogr; 2004 Jan; 2(1):52. PubMed ID: 22815605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Readers respond to "Mammoscam revisited".
    Hayes DM
    N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):304; author reply 304, 306. PubMed ID: 8350926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Readers respond to "Mammoscam revisited".
    Faris JC
    N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):304; author reply 304, 306. PubMed ID: 8350925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammoscam.
    Randal J
    N C Med J; 1993 May; 54(5):194-5; discussion 196-9. PubMed ID: 8510774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. For the patient. Regular mammography screening: making it matter.
    Ethn Dis; 2005; 15(3):521. PubMed ID: 16108314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.