These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8351107)
1. Microbiologic contamination during dental radiographic film processing. Stanczyk DA; Paunovich ED; Broome JC; Fatone MA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jul; 76(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 8351107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacterial adherence and contamination during radiographic processing. Bachman CE; White JM; Goodis HE; Rosenquist JW Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 2122350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial contamination of dental radiographic film. Bajuscak RE; Hall EH; Giambarresi LI; Weaver T Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Nov; 76(5):661-3. PubMed ID: 8247509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing. Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor]. Bai J; Chen H Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of microbial contamination of radiographic equipment and materials during intraoral imaging procedures. Pinheiro SL; Martoni SC; Ogera RR Minerva Stomatol; 2012 May; 61(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 22576444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surface disinfection of saliva-contaminated dental X-ray film packets. Packota GV; Komiyama K J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Sep; 58(9):747-51. PubMed ID: 1458359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bacterial survival in the radiographic processes. Ozsevik S; Cicek E; Bodrumlu E; Guney AK Minerva Stomatol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):135-40. PubMed ID: 22441416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films. Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elimination of electrostatic discharges in automatic daylight film processor systems. A simple, cost-effective solution. Technical note. Asp T; Göthlin JH Eur J Radiol; 1989 Aug; 9(3):142-3. PubMed ID: 2509205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of a new processor containing a self-cleaning synthetic-web transport mechanism. Svenson B; Petersson A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 8508937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of radiographic film barrier envelopes. Hubar JS; Oeschger MP; Reiter LT Gen Dent; 1994; 42(5):406-8. PubMed ID: 7489870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of three surface disinfectants for dental radiographic films and gloves. Coogan MM; Patel M; Mladenova D J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):385-9. PubMed ID: 15193787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interpatient microbiological cross-contamination after dental radiographic examination. White SC; Glaze S J Am Dent Assoc; 1978 May; 96(5):801-4. PubMed ID: 25909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using an automatic dental processor with a film transport system. Thunthy KH Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1982 Oct; 13(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 6959178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors. Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]