These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8351181)

  • 1. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis.
    Higashiyama A; Hayashi M
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size.
    Higashiyama A; Tashiro T
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 2243763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrode placement on the forearm for selective stimulation of finger extension/flexion.
    Bao X; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Zhang J; Lü X; Wang Z
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190936. PubMed ID: 29324829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrocutaneous sensitivity: effects of skin temperature.
    Larkin WD; Reilly JP
    Somatosens Res; 1986; 3(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 3749663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Somatotopic localization of thermal stimuli: I. A comparison of within- versus across-dermatomal separation of innocuous thermal stimuli.
    Lee DK; McGillis SL; Greenspan JD
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1996; 13(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8725650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm.
    Geng B; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():97. PubMed ID: 24908048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span.
    Stevens JC; Patterson MQ
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1995; 12(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 7571941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tactile perception: do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?
    Warren JP; Tillery SI
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Nov; 505(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21575679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at suprathreshold levels: an additive neural model.
    Higashiyama A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):912-23. PubMed ID: 8409866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The identification of the direction of electrocutaneous stimulation along lineal multistimulator arrays.
    Sparks DW
    Percept Psychophys; 1979 Feb; 25(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 432102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.
    Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM
    Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
    Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directional sensitivity along the upper limb in humans.
    Essick GK; Bredehoeft KR; McLaughlin DF; Szaniszlo JA
    Somatosens Mot Res; 1991; 8(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 2048360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial discrimination learning of electrocutaneous stimuli is influenced by the type of stimulation.
    Walter-Walsh K; Weiss T; Spohn D; Torma F; Miltner WH
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1281():47-57. PubMed ID: 19497308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Proximal receptors and the mechanical stimulation of the fingers: a somatosensory evoked potential study.
    Manzano GM; Kohn AF
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000; 40(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10782354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A system for inducing concurrent tactile and nociceptive sensations at the same site using electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Steenbergen P; Buitenweg JR; Trojan J; van der Heide EM; van den Heuvel T; Flor H; Veltink PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):924-33. PubMed ID: 22806702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrotactile stimuli delivered across fingertips inducing the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect.
    Warren JP; Santello M; Helms Tillery SI
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 206(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20862459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.