130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8351181)
1. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis.
Higashiyama A; Hayashi M
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size.
Higashiyama A; Tashiro T
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 2243763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrode placement on the forearm for selective stimulation of finger extension/flexion.
Bao X; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Zhang J; Lü X; Wang Z
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190936. PubMed ID: 29324829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrocutaneous sensitivity: effects of skin temperature.
Larkin WD; Reilly JP
Somatosens Res; 1986; 3(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 3749663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Somatotopic localization of thermal stimuli: I. A comparison of within- versus across-dermatomal separation of innocuous thermal stimuli.
Lee DK; McGillis SL; Greenspan JD
Somatosens Mot Res; 1996; 13(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8725650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm.
Geng B; Jensen W
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 11():97. PubMed ID: 24908048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensions of spatial acuity in the touch sense: changes over the life span.
Stevens JC; Patterson MQ
Somatosens Mot Res; 1995; 12(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 7571941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tactile perception: do distinct subpopulations explain differences in mislocalization rates of stimuli across fingertips?
Warren JP; Tillery SI
Neurosci Lett; 2011 Nov; 505(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21575679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at suprathreshold levels: an additive neural model.
Higashiyama A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):912-23. PubMed ID: 8409866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The identification of the direction of electrocutaneous stimulation along lineal multistimulator arrays.
Sparks DW
Percept Psychophys; 1979 Feb; 25(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 432102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in perception and brain activation following stimulation by large versus small area cutaneous surface electrodes.
Lelic D; Mørch CD; Hennings K; Andersen OK; Drewes AM
Eur J Pain; 2012 Jul; 16(6):827-37. PubMed ID: 22337577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.
Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Directional sensitivity along the upper limb in humans.
Essick GK; Bredehoeft KR; McLaughlin DF; Szaniszlo JA
Somatosens Mot Res; 1991; 8(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 2048360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial discrimination learning of electrocutaneous stimuli is influenced by the type of stimulation.
Walter-Walsh K; Weiss T; Spohn D; Torma F; Miltner WH
Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1281():47-57. PubMed ID: 19497308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Proximal receptors and the mechanical stimulation of the fingers: a somatosensory evoked potential study.
Manzano GM; Kohn AF
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000; 40(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10782354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A system for inducing concurrent tactile and nociceptive sensations at the same site using electrocutaneous stimulation.
Steenbergen P; Buitenweg JR; Trojan J; van der Heide EM; van den Heuvel T; Flor H; Veltink PH
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):924-33. PubMed ID: 22806702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrotactile stimuli delivered across fingertips inducing the Cutaneous Rabbit Effect.
Warren JP; Santello M; Helms Tillery SI
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 206(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20862459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
