These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8351185)

  • 1. A reexamination of duplex perception evoked by intensity differences.
    Bailey PJ; Herrmann P
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 8351185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new version of duplex perception: evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion.
    Nygaard LC; Eimas PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 2380449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Masking and stimulus intensity effects on duplex perception: a confirmation of the dissociation between speech and nonspeech modes.
    Bentin S; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 2380448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Musical duplex perception: perception of figurally good chords with subliminal distinguishing tones.
    Hall MD; Pastore RE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):752-62. PubMed ID: 1500874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: effects of acoustic differences and lexical status.
    Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):268-286. PubMed ID: 8473839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Limits on phonetic integration in duplex perception.
    Whalen DH; Liberman AM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Aug; 58(6):857-70. PubMed ID: 8768181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of auditory streaming on duplex perception.
    Ciocca V; Bregman AS
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 2755760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periodicity and pitch perception.
    Pierce JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1889-93. PubMed ID: 1960282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception.
    Whalen DH; Liberman AM
    Science; 1987 Jul; 237(4811):169-71. PubMed ID: 3603014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of phase changes in low-numbered harmonics on the internal representation of complex sounds.
    McKeown JD; Darwin CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 1775649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorical perception of nonspeech chirps and bleats.
    Pastore RE; Li XF; Layer JK
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 2385489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formant transition duration and amplitude rise time as cues to the stop/glide distinction.
    Walsh MA; Diehl RL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):603-20. PubMed ID: 1775659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: some properties of "central" auditory gap detection.
    Phillips DP; Taylor TL; Hall SE; Carr MM; Mossop JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3694-705. PubMed ID: 9193057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.
    Simon HJ; Studdert-Kennedy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1338-57. PubMed ID: 744835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors.
    Fowler CA; Rosenblum LD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):742-54. PubMed ID: 2148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discrimination of second-format-like frequency transitions.
    Elliott LL; Hammer MA; Carrell T
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1881761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification.
    Hukin RW; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 7885817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hands help hearing: facilitatory audiotactile interaction at low sound-intensity levels.
    Schürmann M; Caetano G; Jousmäki V; Hari R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):830-2. PubMed ID: 15000194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection thresholds for isolated vowels.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):820-9. PubMed ID: 2016431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Listeners' perception of compensatory shortening.
    Fowler CA; Thompson JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):481-91. PubMed ID: 20139461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.