These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8351210)

  • 1. A cruel cut.
    Ogden J
    Nurs Times; 1993 Jul 14-20; 89(28):16-7. PubMed ID: 8351210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the Forensic Evaluation of Psychiatric Disability.
    Gold LH; Anfang SA; Drukteinis AM; Metzner JL; Price M; Wall BW; Wylonis L; Zonana HV
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4 Suppl):S3-S50. PubMed ID: 19092058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Medicolegal aspects in the evaluation of disability in workers].
    Puertas N
    Folia Clin Int (Barc); 1973; 23(7):522-30. PubMed ID: 4270115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving return-to-work strategies in the United States disability programs, with analysis of program practices in Germany and Sweden.
    Sim J
    Soc Secur Bull; 1999; 62(3):41-50. PubMed ID: 10732370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disability insurance under social security.
    Cornacchione M
    J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1973 Jul; 66(7):643-4. PubMed ID: 4268496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disability program. Social Security provides safety net.
    Roberts SS
    Diabetes Forecast; 2004 Mar; 57(3):49-51. PubMed ID: 15017918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. General bias and Administrative Law Judges: is there a remedy for Social Security disability claimants?
    Vendel JD
    Cornell Law Rev; 2005 Mar; 90(3):869-809. PubMed ID: 15868693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [How to interpret the notion of partial inability to work?].
    Kaczmarek T; Marcinkowski JT
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 17571496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comment on federal development of a regulation for reforming the German social security law 18 July 1995. German Society for Rehabilitation of Disabled e. V].
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1995 Nov; 34(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 8570906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Administration about-face on disability could be a political blessing in disguise.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1984 Apr; 16(17):823-5. PubMed ID: 10317445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exemption of work activity as a basis for a continuing disability review. Final rules.
    Social Security Administration (SSA)
    Fed Regist; 2006 Nov; 71(222):66840-60. PubMed ID: 17120379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic patterns in disability--Tennessee and the nation.
    Gardner JC
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1974 Feb; 67(2):134. PubMed ID: 4273872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RX: permanent and total disability.
    Miller MF
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1980 May; 78(5):285. PubMed ID: 6445390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disability in Iowa.
    Wichern HE
    J Iowa Med Soc; 1974 Jan; 64(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 4272925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Social Security Administration's new disability adjudication rules: a significant and promising reform.
    Bloch FS; Lubbers JS; Verkuil PR
    Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Jan; 92(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 17297750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The health and earnings of rejected disability insurance applicants.
    Bound J
    Am Econ Rev; 1989 Jun; 79(3):482-503. PubMed ID: 10318245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Remarks on operative regulations relating to decision making about inability to work in pension cases].
    Chowaniec M; Chowaniec C
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2003; 53(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 14669551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optometrists as "acceptable medical sources" to establish a medically determinable impairment. Final rules.
    Social Security Administration
    Fed Regist; 2007 Mar; 72(40):9239-42. PubMed ID: 17447332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Obtaining legal rights for the severely handicapped patient. What the social security office really wants to know from you].
    Piechowiak H
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2000 Jan; 142(3):49-51. PubMed ID: 10726462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A response to Bloch, Lubbers & Verkuil's "The Social Security Administration's new disability adjudication rules": a cause for optimism ... and concern.
    Rains RE
    Cornell Law Rev; 2007 Jan; 92(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 17297751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.