BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8351458)

  • 1. [Plea for quality cytological specimens in the screening of cervical cancer].
    Marie G; Barjot P; Crouet H; von Theobald P; Soutif C; Levy G
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 88(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 8351458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A normal cervical smear and yet cervical cancer].
    Giard RW; Bosman FT
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Nov; 136(47):2311-4. PubMed ID: 1461300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pitfalls of cervical cancer screening.
    Sedlis A
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 18():103-14. PubMed ID: 1657521
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
    Weintraub D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An approach to the problem of false negatives in gynecologic cytologic screening.
    Hindman WM
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):814-8. PubMed ID: 2686323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality of vaginal smear for cervical cancer screening: a concordance study].
    Cendales R; Wiesner C; Murillo RH; Piñeros M; Tovar S; Mejía JC
    Biomedica; 2010; 30(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 20890555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
    Wain GV; Hacker NF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cervical cytology.
    McCrory DC; Matchar DB; Bastian L; Datta S; Hasselblad V; Hickey J; Myers E; Nanda K
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 1999 Jan; (5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11925972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical analysis of data in cervical cytology from the viewpoint of total quality management.
    Kaminsky FC; Burke RJ; Haberle KR; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1995; 39(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 7887069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material].
    Ejersbo D; Dahl MB; Hølund B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Partial re-screening of all negative smears. A method of quality control of pathology department concerning smear screening against cervix cancer].
    Jensen ML; Dybdahl H; Svanholm H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3024-7. PubMed ID: 10850190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
    Joste N
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; de Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1998 Jan; 118(1):97. PubMed ID: 9580199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
    Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical smears unsuitable for exclusion of cervical carcinoma].
    Giard RW; Blok P
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jan; 144(2):86-7. PubMed ID: 10674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical measurements of accuracy in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 2686324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The PAPNET system for quality control of cervical smears: validation and limits.
    Cenci M; Nagar C; Giovagnoli MR; Vecchione A
    Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(6D):4731-4. PubMed ID: 9494597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation.
    DeMay RM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
    Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.