BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8353005)

  • 1. Population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: do the benefits outweigh the costs?
    Mason JM; Wakeman AP; Drummond MF; Crump BJ
    J Public Health Med; 1993 Jun; 15(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 8353005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening, diagnosis and advances in aortic aneurysm surgery.
    Daly KJ; Torella F; Ashleigh R; McCollum CN
    Gerontology; 2004; 50(6):349-59. PubMed ID: 15477695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An economic evaluation of an abdominal aortic aneurysm screening program in Italy.
    Giardina S; Pane B; Spinella G; Cafueri G; Corbo M; Brasseur P; Orengo G; Palombo D
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Oct; 54(4):938-46. PubMed ID: 21820837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A systematic review of short-term vs long-term effectiveness of one-time abdominal aortic aneurysm screening in men with ultrasound.
    Ali MU; Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Kenny M; Miller J; Raina P; Sherifali D
    J Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 68(2):612-623. PubMed ID: 30037679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Elective versus ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a 1-year cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Cota AM; Omer AA; Jaipersad AS; Wilson NV
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 19(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 16177868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Echographic screening of the abdominal aorta in older men is useful].
    Boll AP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(13):750. PubMed ID: 18461892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [From the Cochrane Library: ultrasonographic screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men aged 65 years and older: low risk of fatal aneurysm rupture].
    Hamerlynck JV; Legemate DA; Hooft L
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(13):747-9. PubMed ID: 18461891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Combination with Medical Intervention in Patients with Small Aneurysms.
    Zarrouk M; Lundqvist A; Holst J; Troëng T; Gottsäter A
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 51(6):766-73. PubMed ID: 26952345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome in Men with a Screen-detected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Who are not Fit for Intervention.
    Lim J; Wolff J; Rodd CD; Cooper DG; Earnshaw JJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Dec; 50(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 26371412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening Program of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
    Sprynger M; Willems M; Van Damme H; Drieghe B; Wautrecht JC; Moonen M
    Angiology; 2019 May; 70(5):407-413. PubMed ID: 30654619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preliminary ten year results from a randomised single centre mass screening trial for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Lindholt JS; Juul S; Fasting H; Henneberg EW
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Dec; 32(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16893663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of screening women for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Wanhainen A; Lundkvist J; Bergqvist D; Björck M
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 May; 43(5):908-14; discussion 914. PubMed ID: 16678681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening men for abdominal aortic aneurysm: 10 year mortality and cost effectiveness results from the randomised Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study.
    Thompson SG; Ashton HA; Gao L; Scott RA;
    BMJ; 2009 Jun; 338():b2307. PubMed ID: 19553269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men remains cost-effective with contemporary epidemiology and management.
    Svensjö S; Mani K; Björck M; Lundkvist J; Wanhainen A
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):357-65. PubMed ID: 24485841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening women aged 65 years or over for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a modelling study and health economic evaluation.
    Thompson SG; Bown MJ; Glover MJ; Jones E; Masconi KL; Michaels JA; Powell JT; Ulug P; Sweeting MJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2018 Aug; 22(43):1-142. PubMed ID: 30132754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life expectancy and causes of death after repair of intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bastos Gonçalves F; Ultee KH; Hoeks SE; Stolker RJ; Verhagen HJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2016 Mar; 63(3):610-6. PubMed ID: 26553951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-effectiveness of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair based on aneurysm size.
    Young KC; Awad NA; Johansson M; Gillespie D; Singh MJ; Illig KA
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jan; 51(1):27-32; discussion 32. PubMed ID: 19837537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm].
    Lindholt JS; Juul S; Henneberg EW; Fasting H
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Mar; 159(13):1915-9. PubMed ID: 9123627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm saves lives at a reasonable cost].
    Swedenborg J; Björck M; Wanhainen A; Bergqvist D
    Lakartidningen; 2003 May; 100(21):1886-91. PubMed ID: 12815873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence.
    Ball BZ; Jiang B; Mehndiratta P; Stukenborg GJ; Upchurch GR; Meschia JF; Worrall BB; Southerland AM
    J Vasc Surg; 2016 Sep; 64(3):811-818.e3. PubMed ID: 27565600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.