125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8355443)
1. [Evaluation of bladder tumor staging by submucosonography].
Onodera Y; Hamashima T; Ikeuchi T; Yoshikawa H; Sasaki H; Hasegawa K; Yogi S; Iguchi H; Matsumoto K; Kai Y
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Jul; 84(7):1281-5. PubMed ID: 8355443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Multiple imaging procedures including MRI in bladder cancer].
Mikata N; Suzuki M; Takeuchi T; Kunisawa Y; Fukutani K; Kawabe K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1986 Feb; 32(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 3524152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Value of nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in the staging of tumors of the urinary bladder].
Schmidt H; Beer M; Block T; Saul C; Werner R; Hahn D
Digitale Bilddiagn; 1987 Sep; 7(3):104-11. PubMed ID: 3677546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Staging of bladder tumors by angiography, ultrasonography and computed tomography].
Uchida T; Arakawa T; Omata T; Ishibashi A; Koshiba K
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Jun; 31(6):949-59. PubMed ID: 3904360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of bladder cancer: comparison with computed tomography (CT) and transurethral ultrasonography (US).
Nishimura K; Hida S; Nishio Y; Ohishi K; Okada Y; Okada K; Yoshida O; Nishimura K; Nishibuchi S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1988 Sep; 18(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 3045372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Determining the depth of infiltration in urinary bladder carcinoma with contrast medium enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance tomography. With reference to postoperative findings and inflammation].
Venz S; Ilg J; Ebert T; Hierholzer J; Friedrichs R; Hosten N; Felix R
Urologe A; 1996 Jul; 35(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 8928358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging of bladder carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging. A preliminary report.
Namiki M; Yoshioka T; Kadota T; Hori S; Harada K; Tokunaga K; Kozuka T; Sonoda T
Urol Int; 1987; 42(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 3672658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A comparison between intraurethral echography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance in the staging of bladder tumors].
Gualdi GF; Volpe A; Polettini E; Ceroni AM
Clin Ter; 1992 Nov; 141(11):393-7. PubMed ID: 1493663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation between superficial and muscle-invasive tumor of the bladder: a comparative study with computerized tomography and transurethral ultrasonography.
Tachibana M; Baba S; Deguchi N; Jitsukawa S; Hata M; Tazaki H; Tanimoto A; Yuasa Y; Hiramatsu K
J Urol; 1991 Jun; 145(6):1169-73. PubMed ID: 2033686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging.
Kim B; Semelka RC; Ascher SM; Chalpin DB; Carroll PR; Hricak H
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 8090898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with computed tomography and intravesical ultrasound in staging bladder cancer.
Salo JO; Kivisaari L; Lehtonen T
Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(4):167-72. PubMed ID: 3072748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiologic evaluation of parietal infiltration of bladder cancer (integrated imaging: US, TC, RM) and comparison with transurethral resection (TUR)].
Gauldi GF; Ceroni AM; Burrai L; Capuano R; Polettini E
Clin Ter; 1995 Nov; 146(11):691-711. PubMed ID: 8720346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Evaluation of parietal infiltration in carcinoma of the bladder: comparison of MR imaging, CT and histology].
Gualdi GF; Caterino M; Di Biasi C; Trasimeni G; Pingi A; Polettini E; Ceroni L; Pirolli FM; Melone A
Radiol Med; 1988 Dec; 76(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 3212242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preoperative imaging for staging bladder cancer.
McKibben MJ; Woods ME
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 Apr; 16(4):22. PubMed ID: 25724433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Urinary bladder MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasm.
Fisher MR; Hricak H; Tanagho EA
Radiology; 1985 Nov; 157(2):471-7. PubMed ID: 4048458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy.
Tekes A; Kamel I; Imam K; Szarf G; Schoenberg M; Nasir K; Thompson R; Bluemke D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):121-7. PubMed ID: 15615961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonography in evaluation of carcinoma of bladder.
Dershaw DD; Scher HI
Urology; 1987 Apr; 29(4):454-7. PubMed ID: 3551280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of MRI in local staging of bladder cancer.
Ghafoori M; Shakiba M; Ghiasi A; Asvadi N; Hosseini K; Alavi M
Urol J; 2013; 10(2):866-72. PubMed ID: 23801469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Transurethral ultrasonography for bladder tumor staging].
Kataoka K; Kaneko S; Kohri K; Akiyama T; Kurita T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Feb; 31(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 3893069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the staging of urinary bladder neoplasms.
Sohn M; Neuerburg J; Teufl F; Bohndorf K
Urol Int; 1990; 45(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 2349758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
