These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 835742)

  • 1. Peer review and professional ethics.
    Sullivan FW
    Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Feb; 134(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 835742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Code of ethics of the Canadian Medical Association.
    Canadian Medical Association
    J Int Bioethique; 1997; 8(1-2):123-5. PubMed ID: 11655377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Code of ethics: CMA policy summary.
    Canadian Medical Association
    CMAJ; 1987 Oct; 137(8):760A-D. PubMed ID: 11658965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ethics in medicine and law: standards and conflicts.
    Norton ML
    Leg Med Annu; 1977; ():201-15. PubMed ID: 593037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The personal is the organizational in the ethics of hospital social workers.
    Walsh-Bowers R; Rossiter A; Prilleltensky I
    Ethics Behav; 1996; 6(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 11656596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethics in the practice of psychiatry--origins, functions, models, and enforcement.
    Moore RA
    Am J Psychiatry; 1978 Feb; 135(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 623326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part I: History of medical ethics, the physician and the patient, the physician's relationship to other physicians, the physician and society. Ad Hoc Committee on Medical Ethics, American College of Physicians.
    Ann Intern Med; 1984 Jul; 101(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 6375501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Containing health care costs: ethical and legal implications of changes in the methods of paying physicians.
    Capron AM; Brock DW; Cassell EJ
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1985-1986; 36(4):708-77. PubMed ID: 11650769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of a professional organization on physician behavior.
    Orentlicher D
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):583-605. PubMed ID: 11652855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethics in medicine and law--standards and conflicts.
    Norton ML
    Scapel Quill; 1977 Sep; 11(3):1-20. PubMed ID: 11662516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Commission on IRBs: an evolutionary approach.
    Veatch RM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 429058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
    Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH
    IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sounding board. Incentive bonuses in prepayment plans.
    Geist RW
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Dec; 291(24):1306-8. PubMed ID: 4431436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical issues associated with peer review in Medicare.
    Schneider KC
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 May; 3(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 2980925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research review at NIH.
    Lipsett MB; Fletcher JC; Secundy M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 429057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International guidelines for ethical review of epidemiological studies.
    Law Med Health Care; 1991; 19(3-4):247-58. PubMed ID: 1779694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The strengths and weaknesses of university review committees to protect human rights.
    Dymond S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Aug; 55(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 4844661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
    Ratnoff MF
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.