These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8357703)

  • 1. Models of source currents in the brain.
    Ilmoniemi RJ
    Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 8357703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
    Stenroos M; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Source reconstruction of brain electromagnetic fields--source iteration of minimum norm (SIMN).
    Liang WK; Wang MS
    Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1301-11. PubMed ID: 19361564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EEG minimum-norm estimation compared with MEG dipole fitting in the localization of somatosensory sources at S1.
    Komssi S; Huttunen J; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):534-42. PubMed ID: 15036048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sparse EEG/MEG source estimation via a group lasso.
    Lim M; Ales JM; Cottereau BR; Hastie T; Norcia AM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0176835. PubMed ID: 28604790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The coupled dipole model: an integrated model for multiple MEG/EEG data sets.
    Bijma F; de Munck JC; Böcker KB; Huizenga HM; Heethaar RM
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):890-904. PubMed ID: 15528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hierarchical Bayesian inference for the EEG inverse problem using realistic FE head models: depth localization and source separation for focal primary currents.
    Lucka F; Pursiainen S; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1364-82. PubMed ID: 22537599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Array response kernels for EEG and MEG in multilayer ellipsoidal geometry.
    Gutiérrez D; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1103-11. PubMed ID: 18334402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Baillet S; Garnero L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1997 May; 44(5):374-85. PubMed ID: 9125822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling and detecting deep brain activity with MEG & EEG.
    Attal Y; Bhattacharjee M; Yelnik J; Cottereau B; Lefèvre J; Okada Y; Bardinet E; Chupin M; Baillet S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4937-40. PubMed ID: 18003114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dipole theory and electroencephalography.
    Niedermeyer E
    Clin Electroencephalogr; 1996 Jul; 27(3):121-31. PubMed ID: 8828975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
    Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effect of boundary element discretization on forward calculation and the inverse problem in electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography].
    Haueisen J; Böttner A; Funke M; Brauer H; Nowak H
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Sep; 42(9):240-8. PubMed ID: 9410154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MEG and EEG topography of frontal midline theta rhythm and source localization.
    Iramina K; Ueno S; Matsuoka S
    Brain Topogr; 1996; 8(3):329-31. PubMed ID: 8728427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver.
    Ou W; Golland P; Hämäläinen M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18979728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.