These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8357709)
1. Magnetic source imaging based on the minimum-norm least-squares inverse. Wang JZ; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L Brain Topogr; 1993; 5(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 8357709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imaging regional changes in the spontaneous activity of the brain: an extension of the minimum-norm least-squares estimate. Wang JZ; Kaufman L; Wiliamson SJ Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jan; 86(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 7678389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kinetic images of neuronal activity of the human brain based on the spatio-temporal MNLS inverse: a theoretical study. Wang JZ; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L Brain Topogr; 1995; 7(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 7599018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. Wang JZ; Williamson SJ; Kaufman L IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):665-75. PubMed ID: 1516933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming. Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum-norm least-squares estimation: magnetic source images for a spherical model head. Wang JZ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Apr; 40(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 8375875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Iterative refinement of the minimum norm solution of the bioelectric inverse problem. Srebro R IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 May; 43(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 8849467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An optimal constrained linear inverse method for magnetic source imaging. Hughett P Ann Biomed Eng; 1995; 23(4):506-23. PubMed ID: 7486357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On cortical folds and neuromagnetic fields. Kaufman L; Kaufman JH; Wang JZ Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Sep; 79(3):211-26. PubMed ID: 1714812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MNLS inverse discriminates between neuronal activity on opposite walls of a simulated sulcus of the brain. Wang JZ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 May; 41(5):470-9. PubMed ID: 8070807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Williamson SJ; Lü ZL; Karron D; Kaufman L Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 1793690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations. Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A ring-shaped distribution of dipoles as a source model of induced gamma-band activity. Tallon-Baudry C; Bertrand O; Pernier J Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Apr; 110(4):660-5. PubMed ID: 10378735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of fMRI-EEG mismatches in cortical current density estimation integrating fMRI and EEG: a simulation study. Liu Z; Kecman F; He B Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jul; 117(7):1610-22. PubMed ID: 16765085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors. Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Source reconstruction of brain electromagnetic fields--source iteration of minimum norm (SIMN). Liang WK; Wang MS Neuroimage; 2009 Oct; 47(4):1301-11. PubMed ID: 19361564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial resolution of neuronal generators based on EEG and MEG measurements. Pascual-Marqui RD; Biscay-Lirio R Int J Neurosci; 1993 Jan; 68(1-2):93-105. PubMed ID: 8063519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dipole modeling of epileptic spikes can be accurate or misleading. Kobayashi K; Yoshinaga H; Ohtsuka Y; Gotman J Epilepsia; 2005 Mar; 46(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 15730537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling. Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On MEG forward modelling using multipolar expansions. Jerbi K; Mosher JC; Baillet S; Leahy RM Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(4):523-55. PubMed ID: 11900190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]