100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8358372)
1. Osseous changes following placement of the transmandibular implant system in edentulous mandibles.
Betts NJ; Barber HD; Powers MP; Wu L; Hennig T; Fonseca RJ
Implant Dent; 1993; 2(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8358372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reconstruction of the severely atrophic edentulous mandible with the transmandibular implant system.
Betts NJ; Powers MP; Barber HD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Mar; 53(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 7861281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The transmandibular implant: implant reconstruction and rehabilitation for the atrophic mandible.
Barber HD; Fonseca RJ; Betts NJ
Implant Dent; 1992; 1(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 1298505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The transmandibular implant: from progressive bone loss to controlled bone growth.
Powers MP; Bosker H; Van Pelt H; Dunbar N
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1994 Sep; 52(9):904-10; discussion 911-2. PubMed ID: 8064452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Case report: the transmandibular implant system.
Tinsley D; Watson CJ; Russell JL; Hassall DC
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2001 Mar; 9(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 11695132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The transmandibular implant. From bone loss to bone growth--an investigation of 116 patients].
Bosker H; van Pelt AW; Voorsmit RA; Postema N; Holtrop G
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Aug; 101(8):309-13. PubMed ID: 11831158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The extremely resorbed mandible: a comparative prospective study of 2-year results with 3 treatment strategies.
Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):563-77. PubMed ID: 15346755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies.
Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Visser A; Vissink A; Meijer HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):926-32. PubMed ID: 23638947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Case report: prosthodontic treatment for the transmandibular implant.
MacFarlane NR
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1996 Sep; 4(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 9171018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Staged reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible with autogenous bone graft and endosteal implants.
Bell RB; Blakey GH; White RP; Hillebrand DG; Molina A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Oct; 60(10):1135-41. PubMed ID: 12378486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rehabilitation of a Severely Resorbed Posterior Mandible with 4-mm Extra-Short Implants and Guided Bone Regeneration: Case Report with 3-year Follow-up.
Fabris V; Manfro R; Reginato VF; Bacchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):e147-e150. PubMed ID: 30231103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconstruction of the severely atrophic mandible using autologous calvarial bone graft: an " inverted sandwich" graft technique and dental rehabilitation with fixed implant-supported prostheses.
Cuesta Gil M; Bucci T; Duarte Ruiz B; Riba García F
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 38(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19910205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant treatment in atrophic posterior mandibles: vertical regeneration with block bone grafts versus implants with 5.5-mm intrabony length.
Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Aloy-Prósper A; Cervera-Ballester J; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Canullo L; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 24818205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A three-dimensional finite element study on two versus four implants in an edentulous mandible.
Meijer HJ; Starmans FJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 7916894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. I. Radiographic analysis.
Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Nummikoski PV; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
J Periodontol; 1997 Mar; 68(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 9100194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing 4-mm dental implants to longer implants placed in augmented bones in the atrophic posterior mandibles: One-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
Rokn AR; Monzavi A; Panjnoush M; Hashemi HM; Kharazifard MJ; Bitaraf T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 20(6):997-1002. PubMed ID: 30307129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A radiographic evaluation of cervical bone loss associated with immediate and delayed implants placed for fixed restorations in edentulous jaws.
Schwartz-Arad D; Yaniv Y; Levin L; Kaffe I
J Periodontol; 2004 May; 75(5):652-7. PubMed ID: 15212346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate occlusal loading of Osseotite implants in mandibular edentulous patients: a prospective observational report with 18-month data.
Drago CJ; Lazzara RJ
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 16681501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
