These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8358579)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Colin STBP-680 at rest and during exercise: an automated blood pressure monitor using R-wave gating.
    Bond V; Bassett DR; Howley ET; Lewis J; Walker AJ; Swan PD; Tearney RJ; Adams RG
    Br J Sports Med; 1993 Jun; 27(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 8358579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Colin ABPM 630 at rest and during exercise: an ambulatory blood pressure monitor with gas-powered cuff inflation.
    White WB; Lund-Johansen P; McCabe EJ
    J Hypertens; 1989 Jun; 7(6):477-83. PubMed ID: 2778314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated blood pressure measurements during exercise.
    Lightfoot JT; Tankersley C; Rowe SA; Freed AN; Fortney SM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1989 Dec; 21(6):698-707. PubMed ID: 2626094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of exercise blood pressure measured by technician and an automated system.
    Garcia-Gregory JA; Jackson AS; Studeville J; Squires WG; Owen CA
    Clin Cardiol; 1984 May; 7(5):315-21. PubMed ID: 6713752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical validation of the accutracker, a novel ambulatory blood pressure monitor using R-wave gating for Korotkoff sounds.
    White WB; Schulman P; McCabe EJ; Nardone MB
    J Clin Hypertens; 1987 Dec; 3(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 3453385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of four ambulatory blood pressure monitors and measurements by clinicians versus intraarterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise.
    White WB; Lund-Johansen P; Omvik P
    Am J Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 65(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 2294682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of automated blood pressure measurements during exercise testing.
    Hossack KF; Gross BW; Ritterman JB; Kusumi F; Bruce RA
    Am Heart J; 1982 Nov; 104(5 Pt 1):1032-8. PubMed ID: 7136994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy of community-based automated blood pressure machines.
    Van Durme DJ; Goldstein M; Pal N; Roetzheim RG; Gonzalez EC
    J Fam Pract; 2000 May; 49(5):449-52. PubMed ID: 10836778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of the Accutracker II ambulatory blood pressure monitor: assessment of performance in two countries and comparison with sphygmomanometry and intra-arterial blood pressure at rest and during exercise.
    White WB; Lund-Johansen P; McCabe EJ; Omvik P
    J Hypertens; 1989 Dec; 7(12):967-75. PubMed ID: 2628497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of the Nippon Colin BP-103N blood pressure monitor.
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    J Hum Hypertens; 1987 Jun; 1(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 3508193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Miniature electronic blood pressure monitor compared with a blind-reading mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnancy.
    Dawson AJ; Middlemiss C; Vanner TF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Nov; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 2583339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of automated auscultatory blood pressure measurement during supine exercise and treadmill stress electrocardiogram-testing.
    Cameron JD; Stevenson I; Reed E; McGrath BP; Dart AM; Kingwell BA
    Blood Press Monit; 2004 Oct; 9(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 15472500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of non-invasive blood pressure measurement by the Finapres method at rest and during dynamic exercise in subjects with cardiovascular insufficiency.
    Silke B; Spiers JP; Boyd S; Graham E; McParland G; Scott ME
    Clin Auton Res; 1994 Apr; 4(1-2):49-56. PubMed ID: 8054837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in borderline hypertension in the child].
    Loirat C; Azancot-Benisty A; Bossu C; Durand I
    Ann Pediatr (Paris); 1991 Jun; 38(6):381-6. PubMed ID: 1929103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of automated blood pressure monitors.
    Nelson D; Kennedy B; Regnerus C; Schweinle A
    J Dent Hyg; 2008; 82(4):35. PubMed ID: 18755068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society.
    Modesti PA; Costoli A; Cecioni I; Toccafondi S; Carnemolla A; Serneri GG
    Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 10226204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of the Philips 5306B electronic blood pressure monitor.
    Hall CL; Goodfellow J; Waites J
    J Med Eng Technol; 1991; 15(4-5):177-9. PubMed ID: 1800749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to improve the accuracy and reduce the numbers of subjects in clinical trials of antihypertensive agents.
    Conway J; Johnston J; Coats A; Somers V; Sleight P
    J Hypertens; 1988 Feb; 6(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 3280674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.