BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8359607)

  • 1. Implementation of the national cervical cancer screening in general practice and feasibility of a general practice-based call system: the GP's opinion.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; de Beijer CW; Gerrits ME; van Weel C
    Fam Pract; 1993 Jun; 10(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 8359607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
    Ridsdale LL
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening in an inner city area: response to a call system in general practice.
    Shroff KJ; Corrigan AM; Bosher M; Edmonds MP; Sacks D; Coleman DV
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6659):1317-8. PubMed ID: 3144375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a call programme for cervical cytology screening in women aged 50-60.
    Robertson AJ; Reid GS; Stoker CA; Bissett C; Waugh N; Fenton I; Rowan J; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):163-6. PubMed ID: 2504360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Organised cervical cancer screening still leads to higher coverage than spontaneous screening in The Netherlands.
    Bos AB; van Ballegooijen M; van Gessel-Dabekaussen AA; Habbema JD
    Eur J Cancer; 1998 Sep; 34(10):1598-601. PubMed ID: 9893635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Austoker J
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):241-8. PubMed ID: 7980803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The organization of cervical screening in general practice.
    Havelock C; Edwards R; Cuzick J; Chamberlain J
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 May; 38(310):207-11. PubMed ID: 3210183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The state of organized cervical screening program in Hungary in 2006].
    Kovacs A; Dobrossy L; Budai A; Boncz I; Cornides A
    Orv Hetil; 2007 Mar; 148(12):535-40. PubMed ID: 17444018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Summary of the practice guideline 'Prevention and early diagnosis of cervical cancer' of the Dutch College of General Practitioners].
    Janssen PG; Boomsma LJ; Buis PA; Collette C; Boukes FS; Goudswaard AN
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A517. PubMed ID: 20051149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adherence to guidelines on cervical cancer screening in general practice: programme elements of successful implementation.
    Hermens RP; Hak E; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Nov; 51(472):897-903. PubMed ID: 11761203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical screening in Perth and Kinross since introduction of the new contract.
    Reid GS; Robertson AJ; Bissett C; Smith J; Waugh N; Halkerston R
    BMJ; 1991 Aug; 303(6800):447-50. PubMed ID: 1912838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mass screening against cervical cancer--what are the viewpoints of female general practitioners?].
    Krohg M; Malterud K
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Mar; 115(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 7701487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Obstacles and reticences in the screening of cancer of the cervix by the general practitioner].
    Weil O; Schaffer P
    Bull Cancer; 1994 Apr; 81(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 7703550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.
    Hamers FF; Duport N; Beltzer N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28362653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.
    Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):98-100. PubMed ID: 2504348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.