These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8359737)

  • 1. [Ultrasonographic evaluation of fetal weight in normal, single fetus pregnancies in the population of Wrocław].
    Florjański J; Zalewski J; Bielanów T; Gabryś M
    Ginekol Pol; 1993 Mar; 64(3):120-2. PubMed ID: 8359737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Ultrasonographic evaluation of growth in twin pregnancies in the population of Wrocław. I].
    Florjański J; Zalewski J; Woytoń J
    Ginekol Pol; 1993 Mar; 64(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 8359738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term prediction of birth weight.
    Santonja-Lucas JJ; Armero C; Martinez-Gonzalez L
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Aug; 12(8):431-6. PubMed ID: 8411324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Ultrasonic evaluation of fetal growth of twins in the Wrocław population. II. Proposed percentile curves of ultrasonographic parameters].
    Florjański J; Zalewski J; Woytoń J
    Ginekol Pol; 1993 Mar; 64(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 8359739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predicting neonatal weight of more than 4000 g using fetal abdominal circumference measurement by ultrasound at 38-40 weeks of pregnancy: a study in Iran.
    Dadkhah F; Kashanian M; Bonyad Z; Larijani T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 22690747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimators of birth weight in pregnant women requiring insulin: a comparison of seven sonographic models.
    McLaren RA; Puckett JL; Chauhan SP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):565-9. PubMed ID: 7898834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria.
    Ugwu EO; Udealor PC; Dim CC; Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Okeke DO; Agu PU
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 24714001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foetal growth parameters--clinical versus ultrasonographic.
    Berry M; Coyaji KJ; Gogoi MP; Kodkany BS; Parikh KS; Patel D; Rawal MY; Sengupta PC; Walvekar V; Dhillon BS
    Indian J Pediatr; 1992; 59(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 1612664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New nomogram for foetal weight estimation based on Hadlock's two-parameter formula.
    Beutler GM; Kurmanavicius J; Hoffmann M; Welzl E; Huch R; Bajka M
    Ultraschall Med; 2004 Feb; 25(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 14961426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
    Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
    Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal estimates of neonatal birth weight in diabetic patients.
    Diase K; Monga M
    South Med J; 2002 Jan; 95(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 11827251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound estimation of birth weight in twin pregnancy: comparison of biometry algorithms in the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort.
    Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Dias T; Cooper D; Thilaganathan B;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Aug; 44(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 24311473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological gestational age and its calendar assessment with ultrasound. Part 1: Physiological considerations.
    Klimek R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 1392635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When Hadlock's methodology to determine menstrual age and weight are used in combination in obstetrical calculation programs, the results are not valid at term.
    Cadkin AV
    J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Mar; 15(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 8919512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies.
    Colman A; Maharaj D; Hutton J; Tuohy J
    N Z Med J; 2006 Sep; 119(1241):U2146. PubMed ID: 16964298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Customized growth curves.
    Gardosi J
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Dec; 40(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 9429785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An adjustable fetal weight standard.
    Gardosi J; Mongelli M; Wilcox M; Chang A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Sep; 6(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 8521065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies.
    O'Reilly-Green CP; Divon MY
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 9239826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonic prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women. Accuracy in an outpatient clinic.
    Nahum GG; Pham KQ; McHugh JP
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 12611089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.