These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Selection of valve prosthesis, reoperation and late result--surgical technique of reoperation with Björk-Shiley prosthesis]. Sunamori M; Suzuki A Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1517-20. PubMed ID: 2586456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aortic valve replacement in adult patients with small aortic annuli. David TE; Uden DE Ann Thorac Surg; 1983 Nov; 36(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 6639195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982). Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Björk-Shiley-Monostrut prosthesis of the aortic valve. Mid-term development]. Canivet P; Vitoux B; Vahanian A; Michel PL; Cormier B; Enriquez Sarano L; Richaud C; Acar J Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1991 Jan; 84(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 2012486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal insertion technique for the Björk-Shiley valve in the narrow aortic ostium. Olin CL; Bomfim V; Halvazulis V; Holmgren AG; Lamke BJ Ann Thorac Surg; 1983 Nov; 36(5):567-76. PubMed ID: 6357126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early experience with the new Masters series of St. Jude Medical heart valve: in vivo hemodynamic and clinical results in patients with narrowed aortic annulus. Zingg U; Aeschbacher B; Seiler C; Althaus U; Carrel T J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Sep; 6(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 9330177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve in the small aortic root. Results in 117 patients with 17 and 19 mm valves. Bojar RM; Diehl JT; Moten M; Payne DD; Rastegar H; Stetz JJ; Pandian NG; Cleveland RJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Dec; 98(6):1087-95. PubMed ID: 2586125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning? Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease: fifteen-year follow up and long-term results. Panda BR; Shankar R; Kuruvilla KT; Philip MA; Thankachen R; Shukla V; Korula RJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Mar; 18(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 19455892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and hemodynamic results of cardiac valve replacement with the Monostrut Björk-Shiley prosthesis. Aris A; Padró JM; Cámara ML; Crexells C; Augé JM; Caralps JM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Mar; 95(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 3343851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in the tricuspid position. Early and late results in 10 isolated and 51 combined cases. Péterffy A; Henze A; Jonasson R; Björk VO Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 725559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcome of a simplified technique for aortic valve replacement with stentless bioprostheses. Di Matteo G; Masala N; Swanevelder J; Davies J; Galiñanes M; Sosnowski AW J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jan; 18(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19301562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Post-operative evaluation of a 17 mm diameter Björk-Shiley Monostrut prosthesis for aortic valve replacement--pressure gradient and effective valve area]. Hata T; Namba H; Sone Y; Imamaki M; Kuinose M; Taniguchi G Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Mar; 38(3):518-22. PubMed ID: 2348138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the 21-mm Björk-Shiley Monostrut valve in patients with a narrow aortic root. Hashimoto K; Mashiko K; Nakano M; Horikoshi S; Kurosawa H; Arai T Cardiovasc Surg; 1994 Aug; 2(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 7953447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]