These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8360607)

  • 1. Assessing the evidential value of DNA profiles matching without using the assumption of independent loci.
    Sudbury AW; Marinopoulos J; Gunn P
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1993; 33(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 8360607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size requirements for addressing the population genetic issues of forensic use of DNA typing.
    Chakraborty R
    Hum Biol; 1992 Apr; 64(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 1559686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of D6S1043 and D12S391 loci in forensic paternity testing].
    Guo H; Lin Y; Liu Y; Que TZ; Yan PH; Zhao ZM; Li CT; Li L
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 23(5):345-6. PubMed ID: 18175572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of allelic dropout on evidential value of forensic DNA profiles using RMNE.
    Van Nieuwerburgh F; Goetghebeur E; Vandewoestyne M; Deforce D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 19029128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probabilistic expert systems for DNA mixture profiling.
    Mortera J; Dawid AP; Lauritzen SL
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):191-205. PubMed ID: 12689791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic individualization of domestic cats using feline STR loci for forensic applications.
    Menotti-Raymond M; David VA; Stephens JC; Lyons LA; O'Brien SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Nov; 42(6):1039-51. PubMed ID: 9397545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. DNA fingerprinting for forensic identification: potential effects on data interpretation of subpopulation heterogeneity and band number variability.
    Cohen JE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1990 Feb; 46(2):358-68. PubMed ID: 2301401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The evidential value of DNA profiles.
    Evett IW; Buckleton JS; Raymond A; Roberts H
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1993; 33(4):243-4. PubMed ID: 8151286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. TWGDAM validation of a nine-locus and a four-locus fluorescent STR multiplex system.
    Micka KA; Amiott EA; Hockenberry TL; Sprecher CJ; Lins AM; Rabbach DR; Taylor JA; Bacher JW; Glidewell DE; Gibson SD; Crouse CA; Schumm JW
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1243-57. PubMed ID: 10582363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.
    Weir BS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1992 Dec; 89(24):11654-9. PubMed ID: 1465380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The fallacy of independence testing and the use of the product rule.
    Buckleton JS; Walsh S; Harbison SA
    Sci Justice; 2001; 41(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 11393945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability.
    Donnelly P
    Heredity (Edinb); 1995 Jul; 75 ( Pt 1)():26-34. PubMed ID: 7649755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.
    Bär W
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2003 Mar; 5 Suppl 1():S41-4. PubMed ID: 12935550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large scale database experiments to assess the significance of matching DNA profiles.
    Lambert JA; Scranage JK; Evett IW
    Int J Legal Med; 1995; 108(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 7495691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short tandem repeat-based identification of individuals and parents.
    Tracey M
    Croat Med J; 2001 Jun; 42(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 11387629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic issues in forensic DNA typing.
    Schneider PM
    Forensic Sci Int; 1997 Jul; 88(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9251228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNPs and forensic DNA typing.
    Allah R; Yang L; Li SB
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 23(5):373-9. PubMed ID: 18175580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A two-locus forensic match probability for subdivided populations.
    Ayres KL
    Genetica; 2000; 108(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 11138941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of multiple allelic drop-outs in forensic RMNE calculations.
    Christophe VN; Dieter D; Filip VN
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():243-249. PubMed ID: 26280568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of different multiplex PCRs for twin zygosity determination and its application in forensic trace analysis.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Schwark T; Christiansen L; Lorenz D; Oehmichen M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2004 Apr; 6(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 15039056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.