These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8361161)

  • 1. Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Lomax N; Murray A
    J Biomed Eng; 1993 Jul; 15(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 8361161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability of subject/bed interface pressure measurements.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    J Biomed Eng; 1993 Jul; 15(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 8361158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of pedar and F-Scan revisited.
    Quesada P; Rash G; Jarboe N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1997 Apr; 12(3):S15. PubMed ID: 11415717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Air-fluidized beds and their ability to distribute interface pressures generated between the subject and the bed surface.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Physiol Meas; 1993 Aug; 14(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 8401275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and precision of two in-shoe pressure measurement systems.
    Hsiao H; Guan J; Weatherly M
    Ergonomics; 2002 Jun; 45(8):537-55. PubMed ID: 12167198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation of interface pressures in low air loss beds.
    Ryan DW; Allen V; Murray A
    Int J Clin Pract; 1997; 51(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 9489088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the optimal inner air cell pressure for the effective reduction of interface pressure.
    Sasaki N; Nakagami G; Sakai K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Nanjo Y; Sanada H
    J Tissue Viability; 2012 May; 21(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 22542135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reliability of disposable pressure transducers coupled with modern pressure monitors.
    Gardner RM
    Crit Care Med; 1996 May; 24(5):879-82. PubMed ID: 8706469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of calibration method on Tekscan sensor accuracy.
    Brimacombe JM; Wilson DR; Hodgson AJ; Ho KC; Anglin C
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):034503. PubMed ID: 19154074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical pressure sensor based on the combined system of a variable liquid lens and a point diffraction interferometer.
    García A; Gómez M; Acosta E
    Appl Opt; 2012 Mar; 51(7):905-11. PubMed ID: 22410894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and repeatability of a pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint.
    Wilson DR; Apreleva MV; Eichler MJ; Harrold FR
    J Biomech; 2003 Dec; 36(12):1909-15. PubMed ID: 14614944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scientific validation of two commercial pressure sensor systems for prosthetic socket fit.
    Polliack AA; Sieh RC; Craig DD; Landsberger S; McNeil DR; Ayyappa E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Apr; 24(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 10855440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shear stress measured on beds and wheelchairs.
    Goossens RH; Snijders CJ; Holscher TG; Heerens WC; Holman AE
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1997 Sep; 29(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 9271146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of sensor size on the accuracy of in-vivo ligament and tendon force measurements.
    Rupert M; Grood E; Byczkowski T; Levy M
    J Biomech Eng; 1998 Dec; 120(6):764-9. PubMed ID: 10412461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pressure distribution of intraoperative chest pad designs in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    MacNeil JA; Francis A; Lane T; El-Hawary R
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Mar; 28(2):E96-E100. PubMed ID: 25075992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring facet loads in the lumbar spine.
    Wilson DC; Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Oxland TR; Wilson DR
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 16321637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A preliminary study on characterisation of finger interface kinetics using a pressure and shear sensor system.
    Hale N; Valero M; Tang J; Moser D; Jiang L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 28856964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of a pressure measuring system for the evaluation of medical devices.
    Bonnaire R; Verhaeghe M; Molimard J; Calmels P; Convert R
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Dec; 228(12):1264-74. PubMed ID: 25515227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pneumatic bladder array for measuring dynamic interface pressure between seated users and their wheelchairs.
    Eckrich KM
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1991; 27():135-40. PubMed ID: 2065148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.