These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 836254)

  • 1. Pseudoauditory air conduction thresholds in the deaf.
    McGargill RL; Egan JJ; Babbitt DC
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 836254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value.
    Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between transducer type and low-frequency hearing loss for patients with ventilation tubes.
    Tokar-Prejna S; Meinzen-Derr J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1063-7. PubMed ID: 16364457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of deaf children using ear-level and body-worn hearing aids.
    Meadow KP; Yannacone CG; Schlesinger HS; Yannacone C; Lage RV; Hynes-Peterson J
    J Aud Res; 1981 Oct; 21(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 7185812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term speech perception in children with cochlear implants compared with children with conventional hearing aids.
    Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S129-30. PubMed ID: 9391631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Vibro-tactile perception in the profoundly deaf child and its possible practical applications].
    Boorsma A; Courtoy M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1975; 29(4):650-6. PubMed ID: 1211161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some relationships between hearing aid frequency response and speech discrimination of profoundly deaf children. Pilot study.
    Dyrlund O
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):201-5. PubMed ID: 3232020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants.
    Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
    Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1415491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Speech perception test in Italian language for profoundly deaf children].
    Genovese E; Orzan E; Turrini M; Babighian G; Arslan E
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Oct; 15(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 8721729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Analysis of word perception in deaf children. A longitudinal study].
    Hélias J; Chaurand A; Lafon JC
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1990; 111(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 2281213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychoacoustic aspects of speech pattern coding for the deaf.
    Faulkner A; Fourcin AJ; Moore BC
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():172-80. PubMed ID: 2356724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Theory-of-mind development in oral deaf children with cochlear implants or conventional hearing aids.
    Peterson CC
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Sep; 45(6):1096-106. PubMed ID: 15257666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of speech perception abilities of profoundly deaf children: a comparison between children with cochlear implants and those with conventional hearing aids.
    Vermeulen AM; Beijk CM; Brokx JP; van den Borne S; van den Broek P
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():215-7. PubMed ID: 7668642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing loss and middle ear involvement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
    Ikiz AO; Unsal E; Kirkim G; Erdag TK; Guneri EA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17482280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The monaural pseudo-stereophonic hearing aid (BAHA) in unilateral total deafness: a study of 29 patients].
    Vaneecloo FM; Ruzza I; Hanson JN; Gérard T; Dehaussy J; Cory M; Arrouet C; Vincent C
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2001; 122(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 12092506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.