These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8362785)
1. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Farrow AL; Zarrinnia K; Azizi K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 8362785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective. Chan EK; Soh J; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 18405817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states. Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facial profile perceptions in a group of South African blacks. Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P SADJ; 2007 May; 62(4):160, 162-7. PubMed ID: 17907584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of profile in bimaxillary protrusion patients after orthodontic treatment. Huang YP; Li WR Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):690-8. PubMed ID: 25347046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft tissue profile analysis in a sample of South African Blacks with bimaxillary protrusion. Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P SADJ; 2007 Jun; 62(5):206, 208-10, 212. PubMed ID: 17886588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators. Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facial profile study using 3-dimensional photographs to assess esthetic preferences of Hong Kong Chinese orthognathic patients and laypersons. Tan SK; Leung WK; Tang ATH; Zwahlen RA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Feb; 161(2):e105-e113. PubMed ID: 34531091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The perceived impact of extraction and nonextraction treatments on matched samples of African American patients. Scott SH; Johnston LE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):352-60. PubMed ID: 10474110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles. Sutter RE; Turley PK Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9851345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness. Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft tissue profile: a survey of African-American preference. Polk MS; Farman AG; Yancey JA; Gholston LR; Johnson BE; Regennitter FJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 7598111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Hall D; Taylor RW; Jacobson A; Sadowsky PL; Bartolucci A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):514-25. PubMed ID: 11094365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Incisor and Soft Tissue Characteristics of Adult Bimaxillary Protrusion Patients among Different Skeletal Anteroposterior Classifications. Siangloy T; Charoemratrote C Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 38786330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles. Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A photographic study of the soft-tissue profile of the Negro population. Sushner NI Am J Orthod; 1977 Oct; 72(4):373-85. PubMed ID: 269666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of a brown subject displaying different degrees of lip projection or retrusion, in the city of Salvador/Bahia. Carneiro EN; Pithon MM; Machado AW; Braga E Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(2):62-67. PubMed ID: 29898159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]