These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8362785)
21. Extraction of four premolars in Black patients with bi-protrusion: aesthetic perceptions of professionals and lay people. Marques LS; Chaves KC; Ramos-Jorge ML; Pereira LJ J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 38(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 21677102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty. Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11786874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons. Souza DB; Oliveira AI; Gouvêa GR; Santamaria-Jr M Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e2220519. PubMed ID: 36074432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Establishment of South Indian soft tissue cephalometric norms using profile angles and esthetic analysis. Biradar AK; Madanagowda SB World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e104-13. PubMed ID: 21490979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcome of orthognathic surgery in Chinese patients. A subjective and objective evaluation. Chew MT; Sandham A; Soh J; Wong HB Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17685780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: A comparison of extraoral parameters. Owens EG; Goodacre CJ; Loh PL; Hanke G; Okamura M; Jo KH; Muñoz CA; Naylor WP Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 12066491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Evaluation of the facial esthetics in an Ivory Coast population]. N'Dindin-Guinan BA; Djaha K; Aka A; Faure J; Roux H Odontostomatol Trop; 2000 Sep; 23(91):15-22. PubMed ID: 11372130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile. Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for African Americans. Faustini MM; Hale C; Cisneros GJ Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9107376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Is the ethnic factor an orthodontic therapeutic instructor?]. Solmaz I; Raberin M Orthod Fr; 2011 Dec; 82(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 22105683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females. Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns]. Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Czarnecki ST; Nanda RS; Currier GF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Aug; 104(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 8338071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population. Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The reliability of analytical reference lines for determining esthetically pleasing lip position: An assessment of consistency, sensitivity, and specificity. Ng JHH; Singh P; Wang Z; Yang Y; Khambay BS; Gu M Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):e14-e26. PubMed ID: 37227323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses. Erbay EF; Caniklioğlu CM; Erbay SK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jan; 121(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 11786873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists. Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mesh diagram cephalometric norms for Americans of African descent. Bailey KL; Taylor RW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 9714287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population. Mantzikos T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 9674673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]