These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

24 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8362899)

  • 1. A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.
    Green BB; Anderson ML; Cook AJ; Chubak J; Fuller S; Meenan RT; Vernon SW
    Cancer; 2017 Nov; 123(22):4472-4480. PubMed ID: 28753230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake.
    Gimeno Garcia AZ; Hernandez Alvarez Buylla N; Nicolas-Perez D; Quintero E
    ISRN Oncol; 2014; 2014():425787. PubMed ID: 24729896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recruiting patients into the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: strategies and challenges across 5 sites.
    Boehm JE; Rohan EA; Preissle J; DeGroff A; Glover-Kudon R
    Cancer; 2013 Aug; 119 Suppl 15(0 15):2914-25. PubMed ID: 23868486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.
    Green BB; Wang CY; Anderson ML; Chubak J; Meenan RT; Vernon SW; Fuller S
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 158(5 Pt 1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.
    Anhang Price R; Zapka J; Edwards H; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2010; 2010(40):38-57. PubMed ID: 20386053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of primary care use on population delivery of colorectal cancer screening.
    Fenton JJ; Reid RJ; Baldwin LM; Elmore JG; Buist DS; Franks P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Feb; 18(2):640-5. PubMed ID: 19190140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.
    Edwards P; Roberts I; Clarke M; DiGuiseppi C; Pratap S; Wentz R; Kwan I; Cooper R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; (2):MR000008. PubMed ID: 17443629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The uninsured and patient dumping: recent policy responses in indigent care.
    Rice MF; Jones W
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1991 Oct; 83(10):874-80. PubMed ID: 1800761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simple strategy to improve patient adherence to outpatient fecal occult blood testing.
    Freedman JD; Mitchell CK
    J Gen Intern Med; 1994 Aug; 9(8):462-4. PubMed ID: 7965243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mail survey of United States hematologists and oncologists: a comparison of business reply versus stamped return envelopes.
    Streiff MB; Dundes L; Spivak JL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 54(4):430-2. PubMed ID: 11297894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Response rates to surveys with self-addressed, stamped envelopes versus a self-addressed label.
    Groves BW; Olsson RH
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1226-8. PubMed ID: 10932585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial.
    Lavelle K; Todd C; Campbell M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 May; 8():113. PubMed ID: 18507819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. International questionnaire postal response rate: an experiment comparing no return postage to provision of International Postage Vouchers--"Coupon-Réponse International".
    Carling C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Jul; 4(1):16. PubMed ID: 15238155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reducing financial barriers enhances the return rate of stool Hemoccult packets.
    Miller MF; Wong JG
    Am J Med Sci; 1993 Aug; 306(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 8362899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.