These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8362933)

  • 1. Predicting success of external cephalic version.
    Newman RB; Peacock BS; VanDorsten JP; Hunt HH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 169(2 Pt 1):245-9; discussion 249-50. PubMed ID: 8362933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of Success in External Cephalic Version under Tocolysis: Still a Challenge.
    Vaz de Macedo C; Clode N; Mendes da Graça L
    Acta Med Port; 2015; 28(5):554-8. PubMed ID: 26667857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the success of external cephalic version with a scoring system. A prospective, two-phase study.
    Wong WM; Lao TT; Liu KL
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 10756497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [External cephalic version of breech fetus after 36 weeks of gestation - evaluation of efectiveness and complications].
    Hruban L; Janků P; Jordánová K; Gerychová R; Huser M; Ventruba P; Roztočil A
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):443-449. PubMed ID: 29302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External cephalic version: predictors of success.
    Aisenbrey GA; Catanzarite VA; Nelson C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 1):783-6. PubMed ID: 10546729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Weiniger CF; Ginosar Y; Elchalal U; Sharon E; Nokrian M; Ezra Y
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1343-50. PubMed ID: 18055730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
    Burgos J; Melchor JC; Pijoán JI; Cobos P; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 20870233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Marquette GP; Boucher M; Thériault D; Rinfret D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):859-61. PubMed ID: 8885736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of fetal presentation on the amniotic fluid index.
    Brost BC; Scardo JA; Newman RB; Van Dorsten JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1222-4. PubMed ID: 10561649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasonographic evaluation of myometrial thickness and prediction of a successful external cephalic version.
    Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Wehrum MJ; Molaskey-Jones S; Sfakianaki AK; Pettker CM; Thung S; Campbell KH; Dulay AT; Funai EF; Bahtiyar MO
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 118(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 21934456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding the breech: Influence of breech presentation on mode of delivery based on timing of diagnosis, attempt at external cephalic version, and provider success with version.
    Andrews S; Leeman L; Yonke N
    Birth; 2017 Sep; 44(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28481464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [External cephalic version in cases of breech presentation: renaissance of a well-known procedure?].
    Schmidt M; Callies R; Kuhn U; Willruth A; Kimmig R
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19204399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version.
    Ben-Meir A; Erez Y; Sela HY; Shveiky D; Tsafrir A; Ezra Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Sep; 21(9):660-2. PubMed ID: 18828059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses.
    Hutton EK; Simioni JC; Thabane L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Aug; 96(8):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28449212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [External cephalic version].
    Navarro-Santana B; Duarez-Coronado M; Plaza-Arranz J
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2016 Aug; 84(8):507-13. PubMed ID: 29424512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial.
    Dugoff L; Stamm CA; Jones OW; Mohling SI; Hawkins JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Mar; 93(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 10074976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of successful outcomes after external cephalic version in singleton term breech pregnancies: a nine-year historical cohort study.
    Cho LY; Lau WL; Lo TK; Tang HH; Leung WC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2012 Feb; 18(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 22302905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the success of moxibustion in the management of a breech presentation as a preliminary treatment to external cephalic version.
    Manyande A; Grabowska C
    Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):774-80. PubMed ID: 19853333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.
    Mowat A; Gardener G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Feb; 54(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24359099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.