These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8362956)

  • 1. Ultrasonographic measurement of cheek-to-cheek diameter in fetal growth disturbances.
    Abramowicz JS; Sherer DM; Woods JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 169(2 Pt 1):405-8. PubMed ID: 8362956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cheek-to-cheek diameter in the ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth.
    Abramowicz JS; Sherer DM; Bar-Tov E; Woods JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):846-52. PubMed ID: 1951542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
    Santolaya-Forgas J; Meyer WJ; Gauthier DW; Kahn D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1072-5. PubMed ID: 7943073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight.
    Hedriana HL; Moore TR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1600-4; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 8203416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal heart circumference as a predictor of menstrual age in fetuses affected by disturbances in growth.
    Hill LM; Guzick D; Peterson C; DiNofrio D; Maloney J; Nedzeksy P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 169(2 Pt 1):347-51. PubMed ID: 8362946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth.
    Hiersch L; Melamed N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S700-S711.e1. PubMed ID: 29422209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fetal superior cerebellar vermian width in normal, growth-restricted and macrosomic fetuses.
    Goldstein I; Tamir A; Reece EA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Feb; 10(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 11332415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transverse cerebellar diameter: a useful predictor of gestational age for fetuses with asymmetric growth retardation.
    Lee W; Barton S; Comstock CH; Bajorek S; Batton D; Kirk JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):1044-50. PubMed ID: 1951511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal cheek-to-cheek diameter in the prediction of mode of delivery.
    Abramowicz JS; Rana S; Abramowicz S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1205-11; discussion 1211-3. PubMed ID: 15846203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prenatal detection of fetal aneuploidy by sonographic ear length.
    Yeo L; Guzman ER; Ananth CV; Walters C; Day-Salvatore D; Vintzileos AM
    J Ultrasound Med; 2003 Jun; 22(6):565-76; quiz 578-9. PubMed ID: 12807073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonography of the fetal thyroid: nomograms based on biparietal diameter and gestational age.
    Ranzini AC; Ananth CV; Smulian JC; Kung M; Limbachia A; Vintzileos AM
    J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Jun; 20(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 11400935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal transverse cerebellar diameter measurements in normal and reduced fetal growth.
    Vinkesteijn AS; Mulder PG; Wladimiroff JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jan; 15(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 10776012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Significance and Outcomes of Fetal Growth Restriction Below the 5th Percentile Compared to the 5th to 10th Percentiles on Midgestation Growth Ultrasonography.
    Zhang-Rutledge K; Mack LM; Mastrobattista JM; Gandhi M
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2243-2249. PubMed ID: 29476559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: a longitudinal study.
    Langer O; Kozlowski S; Brustman L
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991; 27(8-9):516-23. PubMed ID: 1960050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonographic detection of abnormal fetal growth with the gestational age-independent, transverse cerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference ratio.
    Meyer WJ; Gauthier D; Ramakrishnan V; Sipos J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1057-63. PubMed ID: 7943070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal growth curves for an ethnically diverse military population: the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine-accredited platform experience.
    Elliott D; Patience T; Boyd E; Hume RF; Calhoun BC; Napolitano PG; Apodaca CC
    Mil Med; 2006 Jun; 171(6):508-11. PubMed ID: 16808131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal central nervous system biometry on MR imaging.
    Reichel TF; Ramus RM; Caire JT; Hynan LS; Magee KP; Twickler DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Apr; 180(4):1155-8. PubMed ID: 12646474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal sacral length in the ultrasonographic assessment of gestational age.
    Sherer DM; Abramowicz JS; Plessinger MA; Woods JR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 168(2):626-33. PubMed ID: 8438942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening for detection of intra-uterine growth retardation by means of ultrasound.
    Selbing A; Wichman K; Rydén G
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1984; 63(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 6391070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.