These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The influence of referential discourse context on modifier attachment in Dutch. Desmet T; De BC; Brysbaert M Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 11958348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. MacDonald MC; Just MA; Carpenter PA Cogn Psychol; 1992 Jan; 24(1):56-98. PubMed ID: 1537232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How semantics works in Chinese relative clause processing: insights from eye tracking. Liu Y; Ni C Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1294132. PubMed ID: 38440249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations. Hagoort P J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Rayner K; Garrod S; Perfetti CA Cognition; 1992 Nov; 45(2):109-39. PubMed ID: 1451412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How meaning similarity influences ambiguous word processing: the current state of the literature. Eddington CM; Tokowicz N Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Feb; 22(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 24889119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interplay between referential processing and local syntactic/semantic processing: ERPs to written Chinese discourse. Yu J; Zhang Y; Boland JE; Cai L Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1597():139-58. PubMed ID: 25511994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing. Schmauder AR; Egan MC Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1304-12. PubMed ID: 9847553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Spanish: an eye-tracking study. Betancort M; Carreiras M; Sturt P Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1915-29. PubMed ID: 19424908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Mak WM; Vonk W; Schriefers H Mem Cognit; 2008 Jan; 36(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 18323073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Gordon PC; Scearce KA Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 7791600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Vosse T; Kempen G Cognition; 2000 May; 75(2):105-43. PubMed ID: 10771275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In defense of competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Vosse T; Kempen G J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Feb; 38(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18521754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]