These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8364532)

  • 21. Rare Constructions Are More Often Sentence-Initial.
    Temperley D
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Mar; 43(2):e12714. PubMed ID: 30803013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of local and global context on processing sentences with subject and object relative clauses.
    Yang F; Mo L; Louwerse MM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2013 Jun; 42(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 22485022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
    Folk JR; Morris RK
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.
    Gennari SP; Macdonald MC
    J Mem Lang; 2008; 58(4):161-187. PubMed ID: 19724662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Mason RA; Just MA; Keller TA; Carpenter PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1319-38. PubMed ID: 14622064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Referential context and executive functioning influence children's resolution of syntactic ambiguity.
    Qi Z; Love J; Fisher C; Brown-Schmidt S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1922-1947. PubMed ID: 32584080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing.
    He W; Xu N; Ji R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1067-1086. PubMed ID: 28236141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semantic support and parallel parsing in Chinese.
    Hsieh Y; Boland JE
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Jun; 44(3):251-76. PubMed ID: 24723010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Behavioral and neural evidence on the processing of ambiguous adjective-noun dependencies in Korean sentence comprehension.
    Nam Y; Hong U
    Brain Lang; 2019 Jan; 188():28-41. PubMed ID: 30557776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.
    Long DL; Prat CS
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):375-91. PubMed ID: 18426067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
    Jacob G; Felser C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):907-25. PubMed ID: 25397360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries.
    Haberlandt K; Graesser AC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 2927316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI.
    Zempleni MZ; Renken R; Hoeks JC; Hoogduin JM; Stowe LA
    Neuroimage; 2007 Feb; 34(3):1270-9. PubMed ID: 17142061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.
    Mohamed MT; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1797-820. PubMed ID: 21722057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pronoun resolution and discourse models.
    Greene SB; McKoon G; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Mar; 18(2):266-83. PubMed ID: 1532820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Processing idiomatic expressions: effects of semantic compositionality.
    Tabossi P; Fanari R; Wolf K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):313-27. PubMed ID: 18315408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In search of perceptual influences of sentence context on word recognition.
    Jordan TR; Thomas SM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 11827086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis.
    Rodd JM; Vitello S; Woollams AM; Adank P
    Brain Lang; 2015 Feb; 141():89-102. PubMed ID: 25576690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity.
    Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.