157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8364871)
1. The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen-detected cancers.
van Dijck JA; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Cancer; 1993 Sep; 72(6):1933-8. PubMed ID: 8364871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The detectability of breast cancer by screening mammography.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Zappa M
Br J Cancer; 1995 Feb; 71(2):337-9. PubMed ID: 7841050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiological review of prior screening mammograms of screen-detected breast cancer.
Hovda T; Tsuruda K; Hoff SR; Sahlberg KK; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2568-2579. PubMed ID: 33001307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme.
Peeters PH; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Mravunac M; Vooijs GP
Br J Cancer; 1989 Jun; 59(6):929-32. PubMed ID: 2736229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Missed and true interval and screen-detected breast cancers in a population based screening program.
Hoff SR; Samset JH; Abrahamsen AL; Vigeland E; Klepp O; Hofvind S
Acad Radiol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 21216632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interval breast cancers: absolute and proportional incidence and blinded review in a community mammographic screening program.
Carbonaro LA; Azzarone A; Paskeh BB; Brambilla G; Brunelli S; Calori A; Caumo F; Malerba P; Menicagli L; Sconfienza LM; Vadalà G; Brambilla G; Fantini L; Ciatto S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):e84-91. PubMed ID: 24369953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interval breast cancer characteristics before, during and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital screening mammography.
van Bommel RMG; Weber R; Voogd AC; Nederend J; Louwman MWJ; Venderink D; Strobbe LJA; Rutten MJC; Plaisier ML; Lohle PN; Hooijen MJH; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
BMC Cancer; 2017 May; 17(1):315. PubMed ID: 28476109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long term breast cancer screening in Nijmegen, The Netherlands: the nine rounds from 1975-92.
Otten JD; van Dijck JA; Peer PG; Straatman H; Verbeek AL; Mravunac M; Hendriks JH; Holland R
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Jun; 50(3):353-8. PubMed ID: 8935470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A blind review and an informed review of interval breast cancer cases in the Limburg screening programme, the Netherlands.
de Rijke JM; Schouten LJ; Schreutelkamp JL; Jochem I; Verbeek AL
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10807142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme. Radiology Quality Assurance Group of BreastScreen Victoria.
Amos AF; Kavanagh AM; Cawson J
J Med Screen; 2000; 7(4):184-9. PubMed ID: 11202584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. True and Missed Interval Cancer in Organized Mammographic Screening: A Retrospective Review Study of Diagnostic and Prior Screening Mammograms.
Hovda T; Hoff SR; Larsen M; Romundstad L; Sahlberg KK; Hofvind S
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1():S180-S191. PubMed ID: 33926794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of full field digital mammography on the classification and mammographic characteristics of interval breast cancers.
Knox M; O'Brien A; Szabó E; Smith CS; Fenlon HM; McNicholas MM; Flanagan FL
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1056-61. PubMed ID: 25816990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age-specific effectiveness of the Nijmegen population-based breast cancer-screening program: assessment of early indicators of screening effectiveness.
Peer PG; Holland R; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M; Verbeek AL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Mar; 86(6):436-41. PubMed ID: 8120918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of risk factors on different interval cancer subtypes in a population-based breast cancer screening programme.
Blanch J; Sala M; Ibáñez J; Domingo L; Fernandez B; Otegi A; Barata T; Zubizarreta R; Ferrer J; Castells X; Rué M; Salas D;
PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110207. PubMed ID: 25333936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
