168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8365526)
21. [Conservative celioscopic treatment of isthmic ectopic pregnancies].
Chapron C; Pouly JL; Wattiez A; Mage G; Canis M; Manhes H; Bruhat MA
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1991; 20(7):923-7. PubMed ID: 1838757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study.
de Bennetot M; Rabischong B; Aublet-Cuvelier B; Belard F; Fernandez H; Bouyer J; Canis M; Pouly JL
Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov; 98(5):1271-6.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22818285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Laparoscopic surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy: salpingectomy or salpingostomy?
Parker J; Bisits A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Feb; 37(1):115-7. PubMed ID: 9075562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fallopian tube stripping forceps: a novel instrumental design for distal tubal pregnancy laparoscopy.
Liu L; Zhang G; Zhou W; Chi Y; Yang M; Ge L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():109-13. PubMed ID: 25461362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparative case-controlled study of laparoscopic vs laparotomy management of ectopic pregnancy: an evaluation of reproductive performance after radical vs conservative treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Tahseen S; Wyldes M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Mar; 23(2):189-90. PubMed ID: 12745569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is serum human chorionic gonadotrophin follow-up necessary after suspected spillage of trophoblast at the time of laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy?
Bora SA; Kirk E; Daemen A; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 71(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 21160149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Treatment of ectopic pregnancy in 2000].
Chapron C; Fernandez H; Dubuisson JB
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Jun; 29(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 10844323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy.
Tulandi T; Guralnick M
Fertil Steril; 1991 Jan; 55(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 1986973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy management of tubal pregnancy.
Saleh AM; Mahjoub MM; El-Kurdy AM
Saudi Med J; 2001 Sep; 22(9):771-5. PubMed ID: 11590450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Failure of tubal closure following laser salpingostomy for ampullary tubal ectopic pregnancy.
Cropp CS; Cowell PD; Rock JA
Fertil Steril; 1987 Nov; 48(5):887-8. PubMed ID: 2444466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Management of unruptured ectopic gestation by linear salpingostomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Vermesh M; Silva PD; Rosen GF; Stein AL; Fossum GT; Sauer MV
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 73(3 Pt 1):400-4. PubMed ID: 2464777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Salpingectomy - the laparoscopic surgical choice for ectopic pregnancy.
Dubuisson JB; Morice P; Chapron C; De Gayffier A; Mouelhi T
Hum Reprod; 1996 Jun; 11(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 8671423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy.
Tulandi T; Saleh A
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Mar; 42(1):31-8; quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 10073297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management.
Baggio S; Garzon S; Russo A; Ianniciello CQ; Santi L; Laganà AS; Raffaelli R; Franchi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):259-268. PubMed ID: 32852572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomised trial of systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic salpingostomy in tubal pregnancy.
Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Mol BW; Van der Veen F; Ankum WM; Bossuyt PM; Hemrika DJ; Lammes FB
Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9080):774-9. PubMed ID: 9297998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of persistent ectopic pregnancy after laparoscopic salpingostomy versus salpingostomy at laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy.
Seifer DB; Gutmann JN; Grant WD; Kamps CA; DeCherney AH
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):378-82. PubMed ID: 8437790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Is salpingostomy the surgical treatment of choice for unruptured tubal pregnancy?
Rulin MC
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 86(6):1010-3. PubMed ID: 7501323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new tubal classification system for fertility prognosis after laparoscopic salpingostomy for tubal pregnancy.
Ding Y; Huang W; Jiang H; Zhu J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():136-41. PubMed ID: 27285304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Treatment of tubal pregnancy in the netherlands: an economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy.
Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; Van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 10521759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.
Lundorff P; Hahlin M; Källfelt B; Thorburn J; Lindblom B
Fertil Steril; 1991 May; 55(5):911-5. PubMed ID: 1827075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
