63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8365539)
1. Five-year follow up of patients with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in the cone margins after conization.
Vedel P; Jakobsen H; Kryger-Baggesen N; Rank F; Bostofte E
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Jun; 50(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 8365539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization.
Lapaquette TK; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Doherty MG; Yandell RB; Buchanan VS
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):440-3. PubMed ID: 8355949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: management and outcome.
Azodi M; Chambers SK; Rutherford TJ; Kohorn EI; Schwartz PE; Chambers JT
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Jun; 73(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 10366458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: a retrospective long-term follow-up material.
Ørbo A; Arnesen T; Arnes M; Straume B
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 15099966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk of persistent or recurrent neoplasia in conservatively treated women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ with negative histological margins.
Munro A; Codde J; Spilsbury K; Stewart CJ; Steel N; Leung Y; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Semmens JB; Cohen PA
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):432-437. PubMed ID: 28181670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective study of conization of the cervix in the management of cervical intraepithelial glandular neoplasia (CIGN)--a preliminary report.
Cullimore JE; Luesley DM; Rollason TP; Byrne P; Buckley CH; Anderson M; Williams DR; Waddell C; Hudson E; Shafi MI
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Apr; 99(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 1316142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stage Ia1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: conservative management after laser conization with positive margins.
Itsukaichi M; Kurata H; Matsushita M; Watanabe M; Sekine M; Aoki Y; Tanaka K
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Aug; 90(2):387-9. PubMed ID: 12893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cold-knife and laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Tabor A; Berget A
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):633-5. PubMed ID: 2216193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conization for cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ: long term follow-up of 1013 women.
Larsson G
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1981; 70(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 7316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carcinoma-in-situ of the cerivix treated with colposcopy guided epithelial conization. Report of a 4-7 year follow-up study.
Burrowes JT; Sengupta BS; Persaud V
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1976; 14(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 13018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endocervical curettage after cryotherapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Krebs HB; Wheelock JB
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 4009559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management and follow-up of patients with adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Poynor EA; Barakat RR; Hoskins WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 May; 57(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 7729727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cure rates after laser conization for early cervical neoplasia.
Grundsell H; Alm P; Larsson G
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1983; 72(4):218-22. PubMed ID: 6638907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy.
Zaitoun AM; McKee G; Coppen MJ; Thomas SM; Wilson PO
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Mar; 53(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 10823137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positive margins after cervical conization as an indicator of residual dysplasia.
Huang M; Anderson P
Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul; 5(4):160-161. PubMed ID: 10838299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conization as only treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Bjerre B; Eliasson G; Linell F; Söderberg H; Sjöberg NO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 1266896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conization as treatment of carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Ahlgren M; Ingemarsson I; Lindberg LG; Nordqvist RB
Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 1153146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: a metaanalysis of 1278 patients evaluating the predictive value of conization margin status.
Salani R; Puri I; Bristow RE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 200(2):182.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19019325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization: a study of 522 consecutive cervical cones.
Abdul-Karim FW; Nuñez C
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 65(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 3966027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
