These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8367232)

  • 1. Effects of predictable and unpredictable auditory stimuli on selective attention.
    Kiger DM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Aug; 77(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 8367232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective impairment of auditory selective attention under concurrent cognitive load.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 21928926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interference as measured by the Stroop Color-Word Test and the Direction-Word Test with varied comparison stimuli.
    Cannon BJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 1):1019-24. PubMed ID: 9656302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute physical exercise affected processing efficiency in an auditory attention task more than processing effectiveness.
    Dutke S; Jaitner T; Berse T; Barenberg J
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2014 Feb; 36(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 24501145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the executive demands of a one-back choice reaction time task by means of the selective interference paradigm.
    Szmalec A; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Aug; 60(8):1116-39. PubMed ID: 17654395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of spatial and selective attention on basic multisensory integration.
    Gondan M; Blurton SP; Hughes F; Greenlee MW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1887-97. PubMed ID: 21967270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions.
    Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL
    Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonconcurrently presented auditory tones reduce distraction.
    Dittrich K; Stahl C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Apr; 73(3):714-9. PubMed ID: 21264700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance on two attention tasks as a function of sex and competition.
    Palmer DL; Folds-Bennett T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 9638734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic utility of attention measures in postconcussion syndrome.
    Cicerone KD; Azulay J
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 16(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 12607141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection.
    Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2012 May; 23(7):441-6. PubMed ID: 22440977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic detection of lexical change: an auditory event-related potential study.
    Muller-Gass A; Roye A; Kirmse U; Saupe K; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1747-51. PubMed ID: 17921880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-monitoring, need for cognition, and the Stroop effect: a preliminary study.
    Koch C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):212-4. PubMed ID: 12705528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Stroop interference on categorical perception in simultaneous color discrimination.
    Suegami T; Michimata C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Jun; 110(3 Pt 1):857-78. PubMed ID: 20681338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Mozart effect: evidence for the arousal hypothesis.
    Roth EA; Smith KH
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):396-402. PubMed ID: 19093601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.