BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 836761)

  • 21. The Prognostic Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Early Cervical Cancer in Asia.
    Kuo HY; Lin ZZ; Kuo R; Shau WY; Lai CL; Yang YY; Shao YY; Hsu C; Cheng WF; Cheng AL; Yang JC; Lai MS
    Oncologist; 2015 Sep; 20(9):1051-7. PubMed ID: 26240133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan.
    Ioka A; Tsukuma H; Ajiki W; Oshima A
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 35(8):464-9. PubMed ID: 16006573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical carcinoma in the elderly: an analysis of patterns of care and outcome.
    Wright JD; Gibb RK; Geevarghese S; Powell MA; Herzog TJ; Mutch DG; Grigsby PW; Gao F; Trinkaus KM; Rader JS
    Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 15540239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Linear trend analysis of patients with cervical cancer treated at the Institute of Oncology Vojvodina in 2001-2007.
    Nincic D; Mandic A; Dugandzija T; Zivaljevic M; Rajovic J; Vojinovic D
    J BUON; 2009; 14(4):669-72. PubMed ID: 20148460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Young age as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: analysis of population based data from 10,022 cases.
    Meanwell CA; Kelly KA; Wilson S; Roginski C; Woodman C; Griffiths R; Blackledge G
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Feb; 296(6619):386-91. PubMed ID: 3125911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Elderly women above screening age diagnosed with cervical cancer have a worse prognosis.
    Darlin L; Borgfeldt C; Widén E; Kannisto P
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Sep; 34(9):5147-51. PubMed ID: 25202106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer: does the new staging criteria predict survival?
    Garg G; Shah JP; Toy EP; Christensen C; Deppe G; Asaad R; Morris RT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 May; 21(4):711-6. PubMed ID: 21412165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ethnic differences in survival for female cancers of the breast, cervix and colorectum in British Columbia, Canada.
    Hislop GT; Bajdik CD; Regier MD; Barroetavena MC
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 17696733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of inequalities in cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand.
    Priest P; Sadler L; Sykes P; Marshall R; Peters J; Crengle S
    Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Feb; 21(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 19847659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of the clinical features of uterine cervical cancers detected by mass screening and voluntary visit].
    Yoh S; Hasuo Y; Tanaka H; Yakushizi M; Sakurai T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 Jun; 15(6):1949-57. PubMed ID: 3382243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
    Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
    BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Socioeconomic position and stage of cervical cancer in Danish women diagnosed 2005 to 2009.
    Ibfelt E; Kjær SK; Johansen C; Høgdall C; Steding-Jessen M; Frederiksen K; Frederiksen BL; Osler M; Dalton SO
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2012 May; 21(5):835-42. PubMed ID: 22434535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cervical cancer incidence in the United States by area of residence, 1998 2001.
    Benard VB; Coughlin SS; Thompson T; Richardson LC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 17766618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sociodemographic predictors of delayed- versus early-stage cervical cancer in California.
    Saghari S; Ghamsary M; Marie-Mitchell A; Oda K; Morgan JW
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 25794765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trends in cervical cancer survival in Europe, 1983-1994: a population-based study.
    Bielska-Lasota M; Inghelmann R; van de Poll-Franse L; Capocaccia R;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):609-19. PubMed ID: 17399766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand, 1994-2005.
    Brewer N; Pearce N; Jeffreys M; White P; Ellison-Loschmann L
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Jul; 18(7):955-63. PubMed ID: 19580365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical cancer screening and registration--are they working?
    Choyce A; McAvoy BR
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Mar; 44(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 2348149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Cervical cancer in women aged 35 and under:a new disease?].
    Dargent D; Kouakou F; Chomier M; Adeleine P
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Nov; 86(11):635-8. PubMed ID: 1780616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical cancer: women aged 35 and younger compared to women aged 36 and older.
    Clark MA; Naahas W; Markert RJ; Dodson MG
    Am J Clin Oncol; 1991 Aug; 14(4):352-6. PubMed ID: 1862767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical Cancer in Women Aged 35 Years and Younger.
    Pelkofski E; Stine J; Wages NA; Gehrig PA; Kim KH; Cantrell LA
    Clin Ther; 2016 Mar; 38(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 26899314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.