These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8367735)

  • 1. [Blood lamination in bone cement--effect of cementing technique].
    Jansson V; Zimmer M; Kühne JH; Ishida A
    Unfallchirurg; 1993 Jul; 96(7):390-4. PubMed ID: 8367735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Experiences, requirements and development of cement-free hip endoprostheses].
    Morscher E
    Orthopade; 1987 Jun; 16(3):185-96. PubMed ID: 3627791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Computer-assisted experimental implantation technique for comparative quality assessment of various cementation techniques in cemented hip prosthesis implantation].
    Schmidt J; Steür G; Specht R; Kumm D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 Apr; 39(4):79-84. PubMed ID: 8018815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Reactions of the osseous site following implantation of cemented endoprostheses in the femur].
    Köller W; Müller U; Henssge EJ
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1990; 128(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2138392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
    Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative circulatory studies during implantation of total endoprostheses using methylmethacrylate and BDF cement].
    Fuchs HJ; Seidel H; Welter J; Herden HN; Kohler F
    Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1983 Dec; 18(6):291-5. PubMed ID: 6666842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mechanical bending strength of explanted ex vivo bone cements compared with in vitro samples].
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Marx R; Maus U; Andereya S; Müller-Rath R; Mumme T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2008; 146(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 18324590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total hip revision arthroplasty. Prosthesis and cement removal techniques.
    Gray FB
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):313-9. PubMed ID: 1570143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.
    Davey JR; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 1993 Feb; 8(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 8436985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The rationale for cementless revision total hip replacement with contemporary technology.
    Gorab RS; Covino BM; Borden LS
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):627-33. PubMed ID: 8414428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of intrusion characteristics of low viscosity cement Simplex-P and Palacos cements in a bovine cancellous bone model.
    Rey RM; Paiement GD; McGann WM; Jasty M; Harrigan TP; Burke DW; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1987 Feb; (215):272-8. PubMed ID: 3802646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of shock waves on the strength of connection between bone and polymethylmethacrylate. An in vitro study of human femur segments].
    Braun W; Claes L; Rüter A; Paschke D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1992; 130(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 1642041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo versus in vitro polymerization of acrylic bone cement: effect on material properties.
    Bargar WL; Brown SA; Paul HA; Voegli T; Hseih Y; Sharkey N
    J Orthop Res; 1986; 4(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 3950811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The role of acrylic cement in the loosening of total hip prosthesis].
    de Waal Malefijt J; Slooff TJ; Huiskes R
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1985 Sep; 129(36):1725-8. PubMed ID: 4058602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Arterial injury caused by so-called bone cement].
    Neumann A; Berge G
    Zentralbl Chir; 1985; 110(19):1199-201. PubMed ID: 4072461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cementing constrained acetabular liners in revision hip replacement: clinical and laboratory observations.
    Mountney J; Garbuz DS; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Duncan CP
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():131-40. PubMed ID: 15116607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a thin coating of polymethylmethacrylate on the torsional fatigue strength of the cement-metal interface.
    Davies JP; Singer G; Harris WH
    J Appl Biomater; 1992; 3(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10147704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The case for cemented hips.
    Johnston RC
    Hip; 1987; ():351-9. PubMed ID: 3818353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Custom-made molds that prevent cement extrusion through bone defects.
    Slater RR; Morrison J; Kelley SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Aug; (317):126-30. PubMed ID: 7671466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.