These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8368190)

  • 1. [The influence of target blurring and simulated opacity of the ocular media on automated perimetric thresholds].
    Uyama K; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Otori T
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Aug; 97(8):994-1001. PubMed ID: 8368190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Background illumination and automated perimetry.
    Klewin KM; Radius RL
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1986 Mar; 104(3):395-7. PubMed ID: 3754130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
    Gleissner M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of simulated light scattering on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Knighton RW; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Sep; 106(9):1247-51. PubMed ID: 3415549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of refractive correction on automated perimetric thresholds.
    Weinreb RN; Perlman JP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Jun; 101(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 3717255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of cataract on automated perimetry].
    Yao K; Flammer J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1993 Jan; 29(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 8334901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Aging effects on upper and lower half visual fields by VECPs and automated static perimetry].
    Sano N; Adachi-Usami E
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May; 94(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 2220496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cataract and high-pass resolution perimetry.
    Martin L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1997 Apr; 75(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 9197567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Variation of sensitivity in the central visual field by the range of measurement].
    Fujimoto N
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 94(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 2396590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
    Meyer JH; Funk J
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effective dynamic ranges of standard automated perimetry sizes III and V and motion and matrix perimetry.
    Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Zamba G
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2010 May; 128(5):570-6. PubMed ID: 20457977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flicker perimetry resists retinal image degradation.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Gleissner M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Dec; 33(13):3539-42. PubMed ID: 1464498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of decreased retinal illumination on automated perimetric threshold measurements.
    Heuer DK; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Gressel MG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 108(6):643-50. PubMed ID: 2596543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Distribution of retinal sensitivity with blue on yellow perimetry in ocular hypertension].
    Maeda H; Tanaka Y; Sugiura T; Nakamura M; Yamamoto M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Feb; 102(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9513357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A dissociation of thresholds between Goldmann kinetic perimetry and high-pass resolution perimetry in retinitis pigmentosa].
    Tokuhisa T; Oyama K; Tamaki R; Kitahara K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 96(11):1429-32. PubMed ID: 1476073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative resilience of clinical perimetric tests to induced levels of intraocular straylight.
    Oleszczuk JD; Bergin C; Sharkawi E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1219-24. PubMed ID: 22266518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry. Evidence for a learning effect.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Hussey MK; Crews SJ
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1987 Jun; 65(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 3618158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.