BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8368385)

  • 1. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats.
    Sclafani A; Cardieri C; Tucker K; Blusk D; Ackroff K
    Am J Physiol; 1993 Aug; 265(2 Pt 2):R320-5. PubMed ID: 8368385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats.
    Sclafani A; Fanizza LJ; Azzara AV
    Physiol Behav; 1999 Aug; 67(2):227-34. PubMed ID: 10477054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency.
    Ackroff K; Touzani K; Peets TK; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2001 Apr; 72(5):691-703. PubMed ID: 11337001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fat infusions in rats.
    Lucas F; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1989 Sep; 46(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 2623061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Appetite; 2004 Jun; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 15183920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jun; 106(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 22445944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose: I. Intake acceptance and preference analysis.
    Myers KP; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2001; 74(4-5):481-93. PubMed ID: 11790408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose.
    Azzara AV; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 9761229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric ethanol with limited access training.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2003 Apr; 75(1):223-33. PubMed ID: 12759131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roles of NMDA and dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the acquisition and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by oral glucose in rats.
    Dela Cruz JA; Coke T; Icaza-Cukali D; Khalifa N; Bodnar RJ
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Oct; 114():223-30. PubMed ID: 25065714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose infusions: a detailed analysis using an electronic esophagus preparation.
    Elizalde G; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1990 Jan; 47(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2109327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing.
    Lucas F; Azzara AV; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Dec; 63(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9402608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased flavor acceptance and preference conditioned by the postingestive actions of glucose.
    Pérez C; Lucas F; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Jun; 64(4):483-92. PubMed ID: 9761222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences compared with sugar- and fat-conditioned preferences in rats.
    Ackroff K; Rozental D; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Jun; 81(4):699-713. PubMed ID: 15178165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Glucose- vs. Fructose-Associated Conditioned Flavor Preference.
    Inui T; Inui-Yamamoto C; Schmid F; Blonde GD; Spector AC
    Physiol Behav; 2022 May; 248():113730. PubMed ID: 35149056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.
    Ackroff K; Lucas F; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy density and macronutrient composition determine flavor preference conditioned by intragastric infusions of mixed diets.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Sep; 89(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 16854441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():115-24. PubMed ID: 26485294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditioned enhancement of flavor evaluation reinforced by intragastric glucose. II. Taste reactivity analysis.
    Myers KP; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2001; 74(4-5):495-505. PubMed ID: 11790409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.