These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8368466)
21. RAST in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity to dog and cat allergens. A comparison of different extract preparations with clinical history, skin test and provocation tests. Wüthrich B; Arrendal H Clin Allergy; 1979 Mar; 9(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 376183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. False-positive skin prick test responses to commercially available dog dander extracts caused by contamination with house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus) allergens. van der Veen MJ; Mulder M; Witteman AM; van Ree R; Aalberse RC; Jansen HM; van der Zee JS J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Dec; 98(6 Pt 1):1028-34. PubMed ID: 8977501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can the presence of cat/dog at home be considered the only criterion of exposure to cat/dog allergens? A likely underestimated bias in clinical practice and in large epidemiological studies. Liccardi G; Salzillo A; Calzetta L; Piccolo A; Menna G; Rogliani P Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol; 2016 Mar; 48(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 26934742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Allergen content in dust from homes and schools in northern Norway in relation to sensitization and allergy symptoms in schoolchildren. Dotterud LK; Van TD; Kvammen B; Dybendal T; Elsayed S; Falk ES Clin Exp Allergy; 1997 Mar; 27(3):252-61. PubMed ID: 9088651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Allergens in dog extracts: Implication for diagnosis and treatment. Wintersand A; Asplund K; Binnmyr J; Holmgren E; Nilsson OB; Gafvelin G; Grönlund H Allergy; 2019 Aug; 74(8):1472-1479. PubMed ID: 30888707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are allergen batch differences and the use of double skin prick test important? Thomsen GF; Schlünssen V; Skadhauge LR; Malling TH; Sherson DL; Omland Ø; Sigsgaard T BMC Pulm Med; 2015 Apr; 15():33. PubMed ID: 25886946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dose dependence and time course of the immunologic response to administration of standardized cat allergen extract. Nanda A; O'connor M; Anand M; Dreskin SC; Zhang L; Hines B; Lane D; Wheat W; Routes JM; Sawyer R; Rosenwasser LJ; Nelson HS J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2004 Dec; 114(6):1339-44. PubMed ID: 15577832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relevance of Cat and Dog Sensitization by Skin Prick Testing in Childhood Eczema and Asthma. Hon KL; Tsang KYC; Pong NHH; Leung TF Curr Pediatr Rev; 2017; 13(2):120-125. PubMed ID: 28641549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Importance of albumin in cross-reactivity among cat, dog and horse allergens. Cabañas R; López-Serrano MC; Carreira J; Ventas P; Polo F; Caballero MT; Contreras J; Barranco P; Moreno-Ancillo A J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol; 2000; 10(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 10879993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Immunotherapy with cat- and dog-dander extracts. III. Allergen-specific immunoglobulin responses in a 1-year double-blind placebo study. Løwenstein H; Graff-Lonnevig V; Hedlin G; Heilborn H; Lilja G; Norrlind K; Pegelow KO; Sundin B J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1986 Mar; 77(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 2419384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Immunotherapy with cat- and dog-dander extracts. IV. Effects of 2 years of treatment. Lilja G; Sundin B; Graff-Lonnevig V; Hedlin G; Heilborn H; Norrlind K; Pegelow KO; Løwenstein H J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Jan; 83(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 2913138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cross-allergenicity between extracts of hair from different dog breeds and cat fur. Wüthrich B; Guerin B; Hewitt BE Clin Allergy; 1985 Mar; 15(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 3995727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Immunotherapy with cat- and dog-dander extracts. II. In vivo and in vitro immunologic effects observed in a 1-year double-blind placebo study. Hedlin G; Graff-Lonnevig V; Heilborn H; Lilja G; Norrlind K; Pegelow KO; Sundin B; Løwenstein H J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1986 Mar; 77(3):488-96. PubMed ID: 2419383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exposure to indoor allergens in early infancy and sensitization. Munir AK; Kjellman NI; Björkstén B J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1997 Aug; 100(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 9275137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Children Monosensitized to Can f 5 Show Different Reactions to Male and Female Dog Allergen Extract Provocation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Schoos AM; Chawes BL; Bloch J; Hansen B; Stokholm J; Bønnelykke K; Kristensen B; Bisgaard H J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2020 May; 8(5):1592-1597.e2. PubMed ID: 31863911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods. Lee SC; Sim DW; Lee J; Jeong KY; Park KH; Lee JH; Kim JD; Park JW J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Mar; 33(13):e101. PubMed ID: 29573248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of a new type of skin test (Phazet) with existing skin test methods and the radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Kemeny DM; Lambourn EM; Patel S; Lessof MH Clin Exp Allergy; 1989 Nov; 19(6):613-7. PubMed ID: 2598100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of cat and dog allergenic extracts. Boutin Y; Hébert H; Vrancken ER; Mourad W Clin Allergy; 1988 May; 18(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 2456171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]