490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8368659)
1. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter.
Onders RP; Shenk RR; Stellato TA
Am J Surg; 2006 Mar; 191(3):396-9. PubMed ID: 16490554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
Kamat A; Kramer P; Soisson AP
W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevention of complications in permanent central venous catheters.
Takasugi JK; O'Connell TX
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jul; 167(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 3381187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture.
Ribeiro RC; Abib SC; Aguiar AS; Schettini ST
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2012 Feb; 58(2):274-7. PubMed ID: 21674765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Complications of central venous catheterization in hematologic patients--prospective study of 193 catheterizations].
Faber E; Mociková K; Grochal B; Koróny S; Matecek L
Vnitr Lek; 1994 Dec; 40(12):765-9. PubMed ID: 7839628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
Karanlik H; Kurul S
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
Unal AE; Bayar S; Arat M; Ilhan O
Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Complications after insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in patients treated with chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].
Hoareau-Gruchet F; Rtail R; Sulaj H; Khirnetkina A; Reyt E; Righini CA
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 2009 Apr; 126(2):43-52. PubMed ID: 19324328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Horie T; Furihata M; Nakagawa A; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2008; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long term central venous catheterization revisited].
Palermo S; Campolucci A; Capozza F; Cammardella MP; Balestrero A; Ferrando F; Basta P; Launo C
Minerva Anestesiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):451-6. PubMed ID: 8677035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The complications of the use of hemodialysis catheters in central veins of the upper part of body--own experience].
Wojcieszek E; Misiołek H; Kucia H; Karpe J; Kadela J; Werszner M
Wiad Lek; 2002; 55(3-4):197-205. PubMed ID: 12182005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Thrombosis and stenosis of central venous access in hemodialysis].
Vanherweghem JL
Nephrologie; 1994; 15(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 8047195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.
Lorente L; Henry C; Martín MM; Jiménez A; Mora ML
Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):R631-5. PubMed ID: 16280064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Recirculation of urea and dialysis efficiency using dual-lumen dialysis catheters in various locations: may the venous lumen of the catheter be used as the arterial lumen and vice versa?].
Sefer S; Kes P; Degoricija V; Heinrich B; Vrsalović M
Lijec Vjesn; 2003; 125(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 12812016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
