These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8368659)

  • 21. Thrombosis of the superior vena cava and auxiliary branches in patients with indwelling catheterization of the internal jugular vein.
    Li H; Wang SX; Wang W; Xu C; Shen S; Yu L; Zhang GZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Mar; 122(6):692-6. PubMed ID: 19323936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
    Jablon LK; Ugolini KR; Nahmias NC
    Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Sarzo G; Finco C; Parise P; Savastano S; Vecchiato M; Degregori S; Merigliano S
    Chir Ital; 2004; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acute complications of central line placement in profoundly thrombocytopenic cancer patients.
    Barrera R; Mina B; Huang Y; Groeger JS
    Cancer; 1996 Nov; 78(9):2025-30. PubMed ID: 8964028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An alternative central venous route for cardiac surgery: supraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization.
    Kocum A; Sener M; Calıskan E; Bozdogan N; Atalay H; Aribogan A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21474338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Subclavian vein dialysis access catheter-complications are low.
    Karkee DV
    Nepal Med Coll J; 2010 Dec; 12(4):248-52. PubMed ID: 21744768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Central catheters for hemodialysis: a six month experience of 103 catheters.
    Queirós J; Cabrita A; Maximino J; Lobato L; Silva M; Xavier E
    Nephrologie; 1994; 15(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 8047194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
    Hsu CC; Kwan GN; Evans-Barns H; Rophael JA; van Driel ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Differences in the outcome of surgically placed long-term central venous catheters in neonates: neck vs groin placement.
    Vegunta RK; Loethen P; Wallace LJ; Albert VL; Pearl RH
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Jan; 40(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 15868557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A reevaluation of the radiographically detectable complications of percutaneous venous access lines inserted by four subcutaneous approaches.
    Miller JA; Singireddy S; Maldjian P; Baker SR
    Am Surg; 1999 Feb; 65(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 9926744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hemodialysis catheters with citrate locking in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury treated with intermittent online hemofiltration or hemodialysis.
    Skofic N; Buturović-Ponikvar J; Kovac J; Premru V; Knap B; Marn Pernat A; Kersnic B; Gubensek J; Ponikvar R
    Ther Apher Dial; 2009 Aug; 13(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 19695069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A prospective study of untunnelled subclavian vein catheters in hematooncology patients.
    Huijgens PC; Strack van Schijndel R; Kampman I; Ossenkoppele GJ; Klomp-Gerringa M; van der Putten E
    Neth J Med; 1991 Apr; 38(3-4):153-8. PubMed ID: 1881503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in cancer patients.
    Eastridge BJ; Lefor AT
    J Clin Oncol; 1995 Jan; 13(1):233-8. PubMed ID: 7799025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Risk of colonization of central venous catheters: catheters for total parenteral nutrition vs other catheters.
    Dimick JB; Swoboda S; Talamini MA; Pelz RK; Hendrix CW; Lipsett PA
    Am J Crit Care; 2003 Jul; 12(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 12882063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Placement and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports.
    Denny DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Aug; 161(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8333382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of rifampicin-miconazole-impregnated catheters reduces the incidence of femoral and jugular catheter-related bacteremia.
    Lorente L; Lecuona M; Ramos MJ; Jiménez A; Mora ML; Sierra A
    Clin Infect Dis; 2008 Nov; 47(9):1171-5. PubMed ID: 18808356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.
    Haire WD; Lieberman RP; Lund GB; Edney JA; Kessinger A; Armitage JO
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1675136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Davis SJ; Thompson JS; Edney JA
    Am Surg; 1984 Dec; 50(12):673-6. PubMed ID: 6508024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Catheter-related infections via temporary vascular access catheters: a randomized prospective study.
    Nakae H; Igarashi T; Tajimi K
    Artif Organs; 2010 Mar; 34(3):E72-6. PubMed ID: 20447037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.
    Povoski SP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 7(7):496-502. PubMed ID: 10947017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.