These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8368805)

  • 1. Power comparison of various sibship tests of association.
    Green JR; Shah S
    Ann Hum Genet; 1993 May; 57(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 8368805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The distribution of Q: a powerful sibship test of association.
    Shah S; Green JR
    Ann Hum Genet; 1994 May; 58(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 7979160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power calculations for a general class of tests of linkage and association that use nuclear families with affected and unaffected sibs.
    Kaplan NL; Martin ER
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Nov; 60(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 11855953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. HLA sharing in multiplex sibships.
    Suarez BK; Crouse J; Van Eerdewegh P
    Ann Hum Genet; 1983 May; 47(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 6881912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of sibship tests of linkage and/or association.
    Monks SA; Kaplan NL; Weir BS
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Nov; 63(5):1507-16. PubMed ID: 9792878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the power of linkage detection by the transmission disequilibrium test and the identity-by-descent test.
    Clerget-Darpoux F; Babron MC; Bickeböller H
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):583-8. PubMed ID: 8787977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the identification of disease mutations by the analysis of haplotype similarity and goodness of fit.
    Tzeng JY; Devlin B; Wasserman L; Roeder K
    Am J Hum Genet; 2003 Apr; 72(4):891-902. PubMed ID: 12610778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inference on inheritance of disease using repetitions of HLA haplotypes in affected siblings.
    Green JR; Low HC; Woodrow JC
    Ann Hum Genet; 1983 Jan; 47(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 6838170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain?
    Akey J; Jin L; Xiong M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 9(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 11313774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power of affected sibling method tests for linkage.
    Tierney C; McKnight B
    Hum Hered; 1993; 43(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 8406516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The distributions of N and F: measures of HLA haplotype concordance.
    Green J; Low HC
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 6487722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporation of covariates in multipoint model-free linkage analysis of binary traits: how important are unaffecteds?
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Aug; 9(8):613-20. PubMed ID: 11528507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High resolution T association tests of complex diseases based on family data.
    Fan R; Knapp M; Wjst M; Zhao C; Xiong M
    Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):187-208. PubMed ID: 15720300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Affected kin-pair IBD methods: genetic models.
    Motro U; Thomson G
    Genet Epidemiol; 1991; 8(5):317-27. PubMed ID: 1761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal Trend Tests for Genetic Association Studies of Heterogeneous Diseases.
    Lee WC
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27821. PubMed ID: 27278756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haplotyping for disease association: a combinatorial approach.
    Lancia G; Ravi R; Rizzi R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2008; 5(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18451433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonrandom segregation: uniformly most powerful test and related considerations.
    Majumder PP; Pal N
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 3478282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.